 | | DATHeader ALERT!
|
|
Please do not use DATHeader on files that exceed 64k because they will be cut at 64k. I will investigate that problem later. I fixed the problem that I had by mirrored subfiles. cu mikeheide (17 years ago, 2-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts
|
|
(...) hi guys, sorry for the late reply ... I'm abroad until next week and unfortunately I lack a proper connection to the net. anyway ... I started distributing the first parts. please mail me directly if you wanna have parts for the file (...) (17 years ago, 29-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts
|
|
(...) Oh, yeah, forgot about that. I think that was even brought up the last time I was involved in such a discussion. --Travis (17 years ago, 27-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts
|
|
(...) But you should still see them on transparent parts, right? Don (17 years ago, 27-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts
|
|
(...) I see in the stl2dat release notes for version 1.12 an options -o5 (which isn't in the documented options list above) that makes it generate convex optional edges (I think it means concave). That's probably why the inner part isn't smooth in (...) (17 years ago, 27-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts
|
|
(...) The current public version (1.12) of stl2dat set the face color to green or blue when the face contains degenerated triangles (with 2 or 3 coincident points) in the original stl file. This information can be used to clean the result file. I (...) (17 years ago, 27-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts
|
|
(...) It looks like the program used to convert these was not perfect. I’m bet we just need to add the correct edge-color and main-color to the areas that are green and blue. Gallagher (17 years ago, 27-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts
|
|
(...) Digital Designer and the LDraw System Of Tools. This relationship has led (...) This is great news indeed. I am happy to see this collaboration between LDraw and LEGO (especially since I see (URL) parts> I have been (URL) looking for> in this (...) (17 years ago, 27-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts
|
|
That's great news. Just out of curiosity, do the green and blue bits have any significance, or are they just random? Since LDView was used for the part images, and there are plenty of smooth curves, it appears that stl2dat did a reasonably good job (...) (17 years ago, 27-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | L(EGO)Draw parts
|
|
Hi folks, as announced in this thread: (URL) members of the Steering Committee (SteerCo) have been in contact with LEGO to look at ways of working together to ease the conversion between the LEGO Digital Designer and the LDraw System Of Tools. This (...) (17 years ago, 27-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.announce, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Looking for 9V switch as a .DAT file
|
|
Thats is, thanks Manfred! (17 years ago, 21-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Looking for 9V switch as a .DAT file
|
|
Or are you looking for this kind of switches: (URL) friendly greetings, Manfred. (17 years ago, 20-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Looking for 9V switch as a .DAT file
|
|
(...) Do you prehaps mean part 6551.DAT - Electric Technic Pole Reverser? It is in the official parts library. With friendly greetings, Manfred. (17 years ago, 20-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Looking for 9V switch as a .DAT file
|
|
Hi, does anyone has a 9V switch as a .DAT file, unfortunately can't find any on the LDRAW site, nor in official, nor in unofficial parts. Does anyone has it and may tell me the link or send it as file? Why do I am looking for that? I want to include (...) (17 years ago, 20-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: dat file for wedge piece 50955 and 50956
|
|
(...) I too could use these pieces. I better start trying to author some parts myself. Jim (17 years ago, 10-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | 47844 canopy
|
|
Has anyone attempted to model the (URL) Windscreen 9 x 3 x 1 2/3 Bubble Canopy>? I don't see it in the parts tracker or anywhere else, but just thought I'd check whether anyone has something approximate. It's basically (URL) 44567> with a spoon on (...) (17 years ago, 7-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | CATEGORY and KEYWORD extension ratified by the LSC
|
|
The LDraw Standards Committee (LSC) has ratified the CATEGORY and KEYWORD language extension. The most major change between the ratified specification and the de-facto standard is to officially move the creation of new part categories away from the (...) (17 years ago, 10-Jul-07, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: NonCA-parts in need of re-writing
|
|
(...) submitted to the PT: (URL) monitoring the PT activities but it would be useful to drop me a line when submitting a re-written part so I can remove it from the list. w. (17 years ago, 2-Jul-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Missing primitives after part update.
|
|
(...) I don't understand your question. How would you go about doing what? And while you might not know what else the MLCad base path would be, your description of the problem makes it sound like MLCad has to be looking for parts in some other (...) (17 years ago, 27-Jun-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Missing primitives after part update.
|
|
(...) My base path is C:\LDraw. I don't know what else it would be. As for your suggestion, how would I go about that? Thank you so much for your patience -Bill. (17 years ago, 27-Jun-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
