 | | Re: New Part: 712p01.dat - Wing 4 x 8 Curved Left with Red Edge
|
|
(...) I'd like to point out that it's fairly important not to mis-spell "Unofficial". The reason for this is that programs (such as LDView, and in the future L3P) recognize the "0 Unofficial Part" comment and act accordingly. The won't recognize (...) (19 years ago, 25-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 712p01.dat - Wing 4 x 8 Curved Left with Red Edge [DAT]
|
|
Oops! Wrong colour... Here we go: 0 Wing 4 x 8 Curved Left with Red Edge 0 Name: 712p01.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unufficial Part 0 BFC CERTIFY CCW 1 16 -40 4 20 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 -20 4 20 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 0 4 20 (...) (19 years ago, 25-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part: 712p01.dat - Wing 4 x 8 Curved Left with Red Edge [DAT]
|
|
0 Wing 4 x 8 Curved Left with Red Edge 0 Name: 712p01.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unufficial Part 0 BFC CERTIFY CCW 1 16 -40 4 20 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 -20 4 20 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 0 4 20 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 (...) (19 years ago, 25-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Subpart: s\712s01.dat - Wing 4 x 8 Curved Left Edge [DAT]
|
|
0 Wing 4 x 8 Curved Left Edge 0 Name s\712s01.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unufficial Subpart 0 BFC CERTIFY CCW 0 // edge 1 16 -80 4 -30 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 -10 rect3.dat 1 16 30 4 40 0 0 50 4 0 0 0 -1 0 rect3.dat 1 16 -20 0 -20 -60 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 60 (...) (19 years ago, 25-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Seeking keywords
|
|
hi, I bet you natives will come up with tons of keywords for the following parts: (URL) many thx, w. (19 years ago, 5-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | New old train parts
|
|
Hi, I have created to new old train parts and uploaded these to the parts tracker. 'new' because these parts are new for LDraw, 'old' because the parts themselves are old. Part x511 is the old Electric Train Track Contact Base for the blue track: (...) (19 years ago, 29-Oct-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone working on monorail tracks?
|
|
(...) Well, we traced over them today and the two parts do not match each other (i.e. they have slightly different radii and are not complimentary/mirror images of one another). Maybe this is true, but I suspect it's just the angle of the part in (...) (19 years ago, 25-Oct-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone working on monorail tracks?
|
|
(...) I tilted the underside shots to show how the attachment points affect the framework, because it wouldn't be possible to see in a head on-shot (which would be pretty warped anyways). The distribution of the framework is excactly the same (...) (19 years ago, 24-Oct-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone working on monorail tracks?
|
|
Thanks for that, I'll see what my students can do. Couple of questions/comments: The info scans are great because they show how the parts go together, as well as the undersides.. Unfortunately they're not so good for measuring because the extra (...) (19 years ago, 21-Oct-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone working on monorail tracks?
|
|
Now the scans are finished, I thought that others might be interested to see them (at least when someone starts on the ldraw-version), so I've posted them in this BS folder earlier today: (URL) I've included some composite pictures with comments (...) (19 years ago, 20-Oct-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
