 | | Re: Snatch it?
|
|
(...) Very cool! :) Steve (20 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Snatch it?
|
|
(...) I have a friend that lives in Japan and speaks Japanese. I'll email him for help. -Orion (20 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Snatch it?
|
|
(...) I strongly agree with this and feel we really need to adhere to it. This case seems to be shading toward "they approved in advance" but still, it's a good policy to adhere to. I had thought that every avenue had been exhausted, and was willing (...) (20 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 6-stud road baseplates with dark grey road pattern parts
|
|
6-stud road baseplates with dark grey road pattern parts (URL) straight (part 44336, set 4110) (URL) curve (part 44342, set 4109) (URL) junction (part 44341, set 4108) (URL) don't have the 6-stud crossroads (set 4111), so haven't modelled it, but it (...) (20 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part x224: Windscreen 8 x 6 x 2 Curved
|
|
(...) To expand on TWG's answer, LDraw.org doesn't coordinate with Peeron on unofficial part numbers. Once a file is officially released in LDraw, Peeron updates their database to use LDraw's number. There's a plan to have a coordinated numbering (...) (20 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Improved minifig heads
|
|
(...) Yes, I'd say using torii when possible would be good. I don't think we need to start making fractional torus primitives to fill in gaps, but easy improvements are worth doing. To make really beautiful heads, you should model the parts directly (...) (20 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Snatch it?
|
|
[Steve has a brilliant insight, and cross-posts to lugnet.loc.jp] (...) I tried to post a message on Gonta's board, but I don't think it worked (the translator wouldn't translate the posting-response page, it said there was too much text). I should (...) (20 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.loc.jp)
|
| |
| | Re: Snatch it?
|
|
(...) Because our general approach has been that contributions to LDraw.org must be made voluntarily. We are not going to pull stuff in from people without their knowledge. However, would it help at all if we could get someone fluent in Japanese to (...) (20 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming Technic Liftarms
|
|
(...) Hi Steve!.. How is it going since we last talk? Anyway, here are the names that I use in my personal database: Technic Brick Technic Half Beam Technic Half Beam Liftarm Technic Beam Technic Beam Liftarm Technic Beam Liftarm Double-Bent Which (...) (20 years ago, 5-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming Technic Liftarms
|
|
(...) Two alternate thoughts (which I'm pretty sure have been mentioned before): 1. Stick with 'liftarm' for the half-width parts, and 'beam' for full-width parts. 2. Use 'liftarm' for parts with crossaxle holes, and 'beam' for parts with only (...) (20 years ago, 5-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
