To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dat.partsOpen lugnet.cad.dat.parts in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / 5148
5147  |  5149
Subject: 
Re: Naming Technic Liftarms
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary
Date: 
Mon, 5 Apr 2004 19:48:56 GMT
Viewed: 
18083 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Steve Bliss wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Ross Crawford wrote:
> > Not sure if this has been brought up before, but the naming of the technic
> > liftarms leaves something to be desired. It seems mostly the thin ones have
> > just the dimensions, thick ones have "straight" appended. Except for the 4L
> > liftarms.
> > 
> > Bricklink decided to rename these a while back, with "thick" or "thin"
> > appended to them (in most cases). I think this is much better, though maybe
> > still not perfect.
> > http://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?catType=P&catID=137
> > 
> > Can anyone think of a better naming convention for these?
> 
> Two alternate thoughts (which I'm pretty sure have been mentioned before):
> 
> 1. Stick with 'liftarm' for the half-width parts, and 'beam' for full-width
> parts.
> 
> 2. Use 'liftarm' for parts with crossaxle holes, and 'beam' for parts with only
> pegholes.
> 
> Either of these options leads to some type of confusion, either because the
> 'type' of the part encodes the size, or because very similar parts end up with
> quite different names.
> 
> One other thought:  because of the genericness of the beam/liftarm attribute, I
> tend to be careful about identifying parts as "liftarm with ...".
> 
> Steve

Hi Steve!.. How is it going since we last talk?

Anyway, here are the names that I use in my personal database:

Technic Brick
Technic Half Beam
Technic Half Beam Liftarm
Technic Beam
Technic Beam Liftarm
Technic Beam Liftarm Double-Bent

Which correspondes to which type of part is obvious I think. Hope this
helps.(though I know, I was never been succesful in changing LCAD peoples' minds
about part naming)..:-)

A big congratulations to all of you by the way. Number of parts you modeled
increased magnificnetly since I last look..:-)


Selçuk



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Naming Technic Liftarms
 
(...) Two alternate thoughts (which I'm pretty sure have been mentioned before): 1. Stick with 'liftarm' for the half-width parts, and 'beam' for full-width parts. 2. Use 'liftarm' for parts with crossaxle holes, and 'beam' for parts with only (...) (22 years ago, 5-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)

7 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR