 | | Re: New (well...) Part: x717.dat - Brick 2 x 14 with Groove
|
|
(...) *lol* I had to read the header many times to see what you meant... :) /Tore (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x716.dat - 0 Brick 2 x 4 x 1 Ring
|
|
(...) I think so. I don't actually have these parts, but I was just looking at some last Saturday. Here's a comparison pic (URL) TWS Garrison (URL) capital letters in address for direct reply. (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New (well...) Part: x717.dat - Brick 2 x 14 with Groove
|
|
(...) Wow, you weren't kidding about old. I assume the studs don't have logos on the real one, since you went so far as to avoid using the stud primitive. I've never seen the part, so the only comment I have isn't related to the geometry. Any (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x716.dat - 0 Brick 2 x 4 x 1 Ring
|
|
(...) Thanks! Well, it took some hours to make. (...) Oh. I didn't know there was a variant without cutouts. Do they look exactly the same apart from the cutouts? /Tore (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New (well...) Part: x717.dat - Brick 2 x 14 with Groove [DAT]
|
|
Now we're talking *old* LEGO! 8-) 0 Brick 2 x 14 with Groove 0 Name: x717.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unufficial Part 0 BFC CERTIFY CCW 0 KEYWORDS vintage 4 16 140 24 20 136 24 16 -136 24 16 -140 24 20 4 16 -140 24 20 -136 24 16 -136 24 -16 -140 (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x716.dat - 0 Brick 2 x 4 x 1 Ring
|
|
(...) Looks nice. (...) 'Brick 2 x 4 Half Round with Cutouts' would fit in with 3063, 2577, and 30357. Alternatively, "Round Brick 4 x 4 Half with Cutouts" or "Round Brick 2 x 4 Half with Cutouts" (depending on how you look at it) could get the (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part: x716.dat - 0 Brick 2 x 4 x 1 Ring [DAT]
|
|
At last, I lay my greedy hands on one of this rare, vintage macarony variant! I just had to LDraw it at once... A better name, anyone? 0 Brick 2 x 4 x 1 Ring 0 Name: x716.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unofficial Part 0 KEYWORDS macaroni, round, (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Message to Paul Easter
|
|
(...) It must be because of my ISP's new email filters. Make sure your message says something like "ldraw" or "lugnet". They should make it through then. If not, I have emailed you using my backup email address. Paul (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Message to Paul Easter
|
|
Paul, I am trying to contact you using pneaster@knoxy.net but keep getting my E-mail back? Stragely enough it keeps saying user unknown and message undeliverable. Can you contact me, please? Jaco jmolen@zonnet.nl (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Dinosaur parts [DAT]
|
|
(...) I done it. Only the orientation could be a question. Steve please tell me a part-number for this. CU Bernd ---...--- 0 Animal Tail Section (Middle) with Pin 0 Name: Animal_Tail.dat 0 Author: Bernd Broich 0 Unofficial Part 0 KEYWORDS Dinosaur, (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Dinosaur parts
|
|
(...) I began the Tail Section with Pin. CU Bernd (21 years ago, 3-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Dinosaur parts
|
|
(...) The tail sections are in my to-do-bucket. But there are many, many parts with higher priority... /Tore (21 years ago, 2-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
(...) Indeed but... too late now :-( (...) ...but using plates on side of liftarms can be very helpful to stiffen chassis built with them. Philo (21 years ago, 2-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Dinosaur parts
|
|
Hi all, is anybody working on these files? Animal Dinosaur Tail Section with Pin (URL) Dinosaur Tail Section End (URL) Dinosaur Head Small (URL) Bernd (21 years ago, 2-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
(...) Thank you for this illustration. I see your point. These parts should have been originally modeled rotated 90 degrees around Z so that the liftarm "thickness" would have been the same a brick "width". I think I can safely say that I have (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Keyword in description missing
|
|
(...) I'll do it, but first I have to clean up this one: (URL) (21 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
(...) are several of these liftarms getting changed to 18LDU? (...) Liftarms are narrower than bricks, you don't even need a caliper to see it : (URL) ...and measured with a caliper : brick width: 7.8mm liftarm width: 7.4mm liftarm height: 7.8mm As (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Keyword in description missing
|
|
(...) I agree. And the Pattern should be rebuild. In the moment it is converted with bmp2dat and so it needs some time to load the part in the preview. Also it doesn't look fine when you zoom in. CU Bernd PS: I don't own the part, so I can't rebuild (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Keyword in description missing
|
|
While we are at it, I think part 3754P01.DAT Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with LL2079 Floating Astronaut Picture should be renamed to Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with LL2079 Floating Astronaut Pattern Jaco (21 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
(...) I confirm Pauls measurement. I compared it with a brick and it has the same thickness. This is also needed to connect a pin with the holes. CU Bernd (21 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
