 | | Re: x345: Technic Flex System Ball Connector (closed)
|
|
(...) Bingo! Thanks Orion! Theres updated versions at (URL) (22 years ago, 28-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: x342: ~Technic Flex-System End
|
|
(...) OK. Updated BFC certified versions now available at (URL) (22 years ago, 28-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: x342: ~Technic Flex-System End
|
|
(...) I agree! "Cable" is much better. I knew that "Wire" was sub-optimal when I wrote the article, but I couldn't come up with a better word at the time. (...) Fredrik (22 years ago, 28-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: x345: Technic Flex System Ball Connector (closed)
|
|
(...) I'm a dummy. I overanalyzed the problem. Here's the solution: The BFC CERTFY statement dosen't have a CW or CCW. If add CW or CCW everything will show up as expected. You still have to fix the bad vertex sequences and row all 0 warnings (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: x342: ~Technic Flex-System End
|
|
(...) 8?) (...) Good idea! But thinking about it, the "aussie" word that works best is probably "cable", so maybe I'll use that. (...) Can do! Only reason its different is because Miguel's connector(s) are oriented that way & I was too lazy to (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
