 | | Re: Baseplate 32 x 32 Raised with Ramp (fixed version)
|
|
i can fix this (if i remember). (25 years ago, 3-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Baseplate 32 x 32 Raised with Ramp (fixed version)
|
|
(...) Thank you! One more thing: There is a line hanging off the bottom. You can see it if you look at from the side. Jeff (25 years ago, 3-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Baseplate 32 x 32 Raised with Ramp (fixed version) [DAT]
|
|
this fixes the 2 problems that jeff pointed out. i will make sure that it ends up in the update if the part is approved. 0 Baseplate 32 x 32 Raised with Ramp (needs work) 0 Name: 2552.dat 0 Author: Jonathan Wilson 0 Un-Official Element 1 16 300 0 (...) (25 years ago, 3-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 6261 Baseplate 32 x 48 Raised Ramp & Pit Plate
|
|
you little beuty. now all i need is the large size castle wall and i can ldraw 6090 royal knights castle. it also will come in handy for my fortress i am making. (25 years ago, 3-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number needed & New primitive Re-submission
|
|
Before anyone notices (I forgot to change part of the subject :) There is no new primitive in this part. I scrapped it after discussing the part with Steve Bliss. Thanks Steve, Adam (25 years ago, 3-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Part number needed & New primitive Re-submission [DAT]
|
|
0 Pane Window Latticed 1 x 2 x 3 with 2/4 Circle Top 0 Name: ????.dat 0 Author: Adam B. Howard 0 Un-Official Element 0 CW Quads 4 16 16 32 -3 12 28 -3 12 -4 -3 16 -4 -3 4 16 12 28 3 16 32 3 16 -4 3 12 -4 3 4 16 16 32 3 16 32 -3 16 -4 -3 16 -4 3 4 16 (...) (25 years ago, 3-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | 6261 Baseplate 32 x 48 Raised Ramp & Pit Plate [DAT]
|
|
This is the Baseplate from 6090 Royal Knight's Castle. I started this a couple days ago, and finally finished tonight. I was suprised at how easy it was (easy, but tedious), and it kinda made me wonder why no one did it before. Oh, well, Enjoy! Jeff (...) (25 years ago, 3-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | tile 2 x 2 round with archery target pattern [DAT]
|
|
0 Tile 2 x 2 Round with Archery Target Pattern 0 Name: 4150p02.dat 0 Author: Jonathan Wilson 0 Unofficial Element 2 24 0 8 2 4 8 6 2 24 4 8 6 6 8 4 2 24 6 8 4 2 8 0 2 24 0 8 2 -4 8 6 2 24 -4 8 6 -6 8 4 2 24 -6 8 4 -2 8 0 2 24 0 8 -2 4 8 -6 2 24 4 8 (...) (25 years ago, 1-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Revised Arched Latticed WIndow Pane [DAT]
|
|
I renamed the primitive to box6nl.dat (since it has 6 faces). I revised the part so that now the rotational axis is aligned with the x-axis. This means that if you want to rotate the window once it has been placed in a model you will have to move it (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: minifig crossbow
|
|
(...) adam howard offered to redo the "arms" or the part as he said that they were the wrong size... (25 years ago, 31-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: minifig crossbow
|
|
Jonathan, you have improved very much. I never would have guessed this piece to be done by you if someone had just 'laid it in front of me'. Good job. I only noticed two mistakes that should be fairly easy to correct 1. The handle is too far (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Unofficial part: Technic Connector Half [DAT]
|
|
0 Hi, this part is probably quite rare in the US yet, having appeared 0 mostly in European sets so far. It is however appearing in 8445. 0 0 Nevertheless, I would be happy if you could take a look at it and 0 report any flaws you can see. 0 0 Also, (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: minifig crossbow
|
|
the part as posted has an error in it. there are some parts that are color #7 instead of color #16. i am aware of this and have fixed the part. (25 years ago, 31-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | minifig crossbow [DAT]
|
|
here is the minifig crossbow. 0 Minifig Crossbow 0 Author: Jonathan Wilson 0 Author: Adam Howard (ring on front) 0 Name: 2570.dat 0 Unofficial Element 3 16 4 -1 0 -4 -1 0 0 -1 -6 3 16 4 1 0 -4 1 0 0 1 -6 4 16 4 4 18 4 4 0 -4 4 0 -4 4 18 4 16 4 0 18 (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number needed & New primitive submission
|
|
(...) Just so y'all know, I haven't heard back from Mindspring, Jacob, or Nordu.net in quite a few days. It appears there remains a problem :( -Tim <>< (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 Get paid to surf the web! Visit: (URL) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number needed & New primitive submission
|
|
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:379efb57.879462...net.com... (...) to (...) I have rethought my original decision on both of these. I realize the end quads will never be seen, but is that a reason to create a new (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number needed & New primitive submission
|
|
Thought experiment was very convincing. I'll redo the part so that the axis of rotation is around the x axis (I'll check the orientation of 30044 first to make sure the axis is correct). This way you'll only have to move the part in the y direction (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number needed & New primitive submission
|
|
Hi Chris, Thanks for the link, unfortunately my ISP is Mindspring and I have never been able to link to ldraw.org. Tim is working on solving the problem. Could you send me a copy though. Thanks, Adam (...) from (...) the (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number needed & New primitive submission
|
|
[followups set to lugnet.cad.dev] (...) Looks like box.dat is the only one based on a 2x2x2 cube, all the other box*.dat primitives are 2x1x2, Y[0,1]. So this new primitive should be written the same way. (...) Clear naming would be nice, but we (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number needed & New primitive submission
|
|
[followups set to lugnet.cad.dev - let's reign in this multi-ng discussion] (...) See my other post. The A key is very nice, it saves 5 keystrokes. But it isn't a reason to create a part in a bizarre orientation. Steve (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
