 | | Part number needed & New primitive Re-submission [DAT]
|
|
0 Pane Window Latticed 1 x 2 x 3 with 2/4 Circle Top 0 Name: ????.dat 0 Author: Adam B. Howard 0 Un-Official Element 0 CW Quads 4 16 16 32 -3 12 28 -3 12 -4 -3 16 -4 -3 4 16 12 28 3 16 32 3 16 -4 3 12 -4 3 4 16 16 32 3 16 32 -3 16 -4 -3 16 -4 3 4 16 (...) (25 years ago, 3-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | 6261 Baseplate 32 x 48 Raised Ramp & Pit Plate [DAT]
|
|
This is the Baseplate from 6090 Royal Knight's Castle. I started this a couple days ago, and finally finished tonight. I was suprised at how easy it was (easy, but tedious), and it kinda made me wonder why no one did it before. Oh, well, Enjoy! Jeff (...) (25 years ago, 3-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | tile 2 x 2 round with archery target pattern [DAT]
|
|
0 Tile 2 x 2 Round with Archery Target Pattern 0 Name: 4150p02.dat 0 Author: Jonathan Wilson 0 Unofficial Element 2 24 0 8 2 4 8 6 2 24 4 8 6 6 8 4 2 24 6 8 4 2 8 0 2 24 0 8 2 -4 8 6 2 24 -4 8 6 -6 8 4 2 24 -6 8 4 -2 8 0 2 24 0 8 -2 4 8 -6 2 24 4 8 (...) (25 years ago, 1-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Revised Arched Latticed WIndow Pane [DAT]
|
|
I renamed the primitive to box6nl.dat (since it has 6 faces). I revised the part so that now the rotational axis is aligned with the x-axis. This means that if you want to rotate the window once it has been placed in a model you will have to move it (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: minifig crossbow
|
|
(...) adam howard offered to redo the "arms" or the part as he said that they were the wrong size... (25 years ago, 31-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: minifig crossbow
|
|
Jonathan, you have improved very much. I never would have guessed this piece to be done by you if someone had just 'laid it in front of me'. Good job. I only noticed two mistakes that should be fairly easy to correct 1. The handle is too far (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Unofficial part: Technic Connector Half [DAT]
|
|
0 Hi, this part is probably quite rare in the US yet, having appeared 0 mostly in European sets so far. It is however appearing in 8445. 0 0 Nevertheless, I would be happy if you could take a look at it and 0 report any flaws you can see. 0 0 Also, (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: minifig crossbow
|
|
the part as posted has an error in it. there are some parts that are color #7 instead of color #16. i am aware of this and have fixed the part. (25 years ago, 31-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | minifig crossbow [DAT]
|
|
here is the minifig crossbow. 0 Minifig Crossbow 0 Author: Jonathan Wilson 0 Author: Adam Howard (ring on front) 0 Name: 2570.dat 0 Unofficial Element 3 16 4 -1 0 -4 -1 0 0 -1 -6 3 16 4 1 0 -4 1 0 0 1 -6 4 16 4 4 18 4 4 0 -4 4 0 -4 4 18 4 16 4 0 18 (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number needed & New primitive submission
|
|
(...) Just so y'all know, I haven't heard back from Mindspring, Jacob, or Nordu.net in quite a few days. It appears there remains a problem :( -Tim <>< (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 Get paid to surf the web! Visit: (URL) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number needed & New primitive submission
|
|
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:379efb57.879462...net.com... (...) to (...) I have rethought my original decision on both of these. I realize the end quads will never be seen, but is that a reason to create a new (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number needed & New primitive submission
|
|
Thought experiment was very convincing. I'll redo the part so that the axis of rotation is around the x axis (I'll check the orientation of 30044 first to make sure the axis is correct). This way you'll only have to move the part in the y direction (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number needed & New primitive submission
|
|
Hi Chris, Thanks for the link, unfortunately my ISP is Mindspring and I have never been able to link to ldraw.org. Tim is working on solving the problem. Could you send me a copy though. Thanks, Adam (...) from (...) the (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number needed & New primitive submission
|
|
[followups set to lugnet.cad.dev] (...) Looks like box.dat is the only one based on a 2x2x2 cube, all the other box*.dat primitives are 2x1x2, Y[0,1]. So this new primitive should be written the same way. (...) Clear naming would be nice, but we (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number needed & New primitive submission
|
|
[followups set to lugnet.cad.dev - let's reign in this multi-ng discussion] (...) See my other post. The A key is very nice, it saves 5 keystrokes. But it isn't a reason to create a part in a bizarre orientation. Steve (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number needed & New primitive submission
|
|
(...) Hmm. That's not *exactly* the intended guideline. Rotatable parts should be positioned so the axis of rotation lies on one of the major axes. That way, the part can be easily rotated to any angle. (...) But the A key function is only useful if (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Part number needed & New primitive submission
|
|
(...) My Primitives Reference ((URL) linked from the LDraw FAQ, was intended to help in this respect. It is missing some of the more recent additions, but I'm sure I sent an updated version to Jacob, sometime back. I'll review it again and re-send. (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number needed & New primitive submission
|
|
(...) What about the a key? Shouldn't that be considered when creating new parts that rotate? Adam (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number needed & New primitive submission
|
|
(...) Window (...) is (...) I disagree. There are a number of pieces (just about all) that need to be rotated one way or another to achieve the look you want. The design of xxxx just takes into account the rotational axis as an aid in positioning (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
