 | | 32324 Technic Brick 4 x 4 with open center 2 x 2 [DAT]
|
|
0 Technic Brick 4 x 4 with open center 2 x 2 0 Name: 32324.dat 0 Author: Marc Klein 0 Created with stl2dat conversion tool 0 Un-Official LCad part 1 16 38 10 0 0 -16 0 0 0 6 -6 0 0 4-4cyli.dat 1 16 38 10 0 0 -1 0 0 0 6 -6 0 0 4-4edge.dat 1 16 22 10 (...) (24 years ago, 27-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Can anyone tell me where to get a small UFO top saucer section?
|
|
(...) In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Mike Cormier answered: (...) No, Parts Tracker sais Tim Romine is doing these parts now (he has taken over from Paul Easter) In the Temporary Parts Tracker, look for part numbers 30116 and 30117 to keep track on their (...) (24 years ago, 27-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Can anyone tell me where to get a small UFO top saucer section?
|
|
(...) I think Paul Easter is working on one, but I forget his address. Thankfully, he does a LOT of parts, and if you go to the Temporary Parts Tracker, you're sure to find a link to his site. P.S. I'm interested in saucer hulls too. Mike (24 years ago, 27-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 2x2 round tile with imperial logo
|
|
(...) Standard accepted practice in the parts authoring community is to *not* do this. That is, don't draw parts you don't actually have in front of you. That pic I posted is enough to tell that a part is "wrong" but not enough to tell that a part (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 2x2 round tile with imperial logo
|
|
(...) Actually, I'm drawing it from memory, which isn't working quite as well as I hoped it would (I've got the set that it's from, but it's in storage right now). I'm sure that if I had a part or a good close-up pic or scan that I could work from (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 2x2 round tile with imperial logo
|
|
(...) Whoops, sorry about that! Well, I think it needs more work then. I can't find a really definitive picture, but if you look here: (URL) scroll to the roof view: (URL) will see that the black outer circle is significantly less than the tile (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Repost: 4150imp.dat
|
|
(...) <snip> I am not a parts author so I could be all wet, but I just checked this out, and I still see what appear to possibly be errors. 5 "spokes" appear to have "wide flat arrows" pointing out, but one does not. Is that correct? (I don't have (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Repost: 4150imp.dat [DAT]
|
|
Let's try this with the web poster (I swear, it didn't exist until Mr. Bliss mentioned it to me) 0 Tile 2 x 2 Round With Imperial Symbol 0 Name: 4150imp.dat 0 Unofficial part 0 Author: Matt Schild 2 24 0 8 2 4 8 6 2 24 4 8 6 6 8 4 2 24 6 8 4 2 8 0 2 (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 2x2 round tile with imperial logo
|
|
(...) have. Possibly, either that or it's the difficulty of putting a 6 sided design on a 16 sided surface and trying to make it look right. (...) call (...) at (...) *ahem* that is exactly what this part is <i>supposed</i> to be. *sigh* back to the (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 2x2 round tile with imperial logo
|
|
(...) I checked this part out, it looks distorted to me, is that due to the word wrap? I think the base color ring around the edge may be a good thing to have. Also, is anyone working on a decoration sort of similar to this one, I call it the (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
