 | | Re: More Moonbase Madness ...
|
|
Thanks. I'll have to give it a try and see how it looks that way : ) (...) (21 years ago, 2-Apr-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Moonbase Observatory
|
|
Ooh, very VERY cool. I love the shape and the windows you used. Very nice- a cool distinctive part of a moonbase. Less war, more science! :) (...) You'd be suprised. I've seen models equally good that have gotton no feedback at all. -JHK (21 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Moonbase Observatory
|
|
(...) Wow, two hours have passed and no one else commented on this yet? Well I think it is a great model. Actually when I read the subject of the post I immediately began running through ideas of how I might build a deep space telescope into a (...) (21 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: More Moonbase Madness ...
|
|
These are all very cool and well thought of! I am absolutely stunned about the Pyramid thing (URL) you should use straight regular bricks though to give it a more Egyptian kind of look! I am also trying some more moonbase stuff after the (...) (21 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Moonbase Observatory
|
|
Hello all, Here is my Moonbase version of my Observatory! Photo's: (2 URLs) (deep link) LMKWYT Original Observatory Photo's: (2 URLs) are also some renders of both observatories and several other models: (URL) (21 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.space) !
|
| |
| | Re: possible rendering problem with LDLite and transparent parts
|
|
(...) Ok, but I just tested flat.dat with ldlite 2.3 and your command line: ldlite.exe -W2 -MS -S3.0 -C15 -A0.707104,0,0.70710...-0.650895, 0.390731,0.650895 -D1 -U02500,02500 -I-4 -K flat.dat It worked just fine on Win2K with only 192MB. However, I (...) (21 years ago, 31-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: possible rendering problem with LDLite and transparent parts
|
|
(...) I am viewing them at full scale. It's related to the size of the work area, I'm pretty sure, rather than the resolution they're viewed at. 4000x4000 is a pretty good sized chunk of memory, I expect. Gyug sent me a note, he's looking into it. (21 years ago, 31-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: possible rendering problem with LDLite and transparent parts
|
|
(...) How are you viewing the resulting image files? Have you looked at them at full scale? Your problem may be aliasing in the resampling of the images when viewed at reduced scale, and not a problem in ldlite. Check with Jacob for tips on how to (...) (21 years ago, 31-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Color problem- is this a bug in L3P?
|
|
(...) I do this sometimes to show the part rendered from a different angle to make it clear what part is being attached... usually it's an assembly of more than one part but not always. (21 years ago, 29-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | possible rendering problem with LDLite and transparent parts [DAT]
|
|
I have encountered a small problem rendering transparent parts with LDLite 2.4 and I am wondering if anyone else has run into it. consider the file flat.dat, attached It has a trans yellow, trans cyan and trans white brick in it as the first step (...) (21 years ago, 29-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
