 | | Re: Parts vs subparts for compound parts
|
|
(...) That's why I want to know for sure what to do for new authored parts. (I can't always look how existing parts were done, as these may not be conform to current rules, like you said.) (...) Many windows have just a simple rectangular glass (...) (22 years ago, 31-Aug-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts vs subparts for compound parts
|
|
(...) There isn't always a flat rule for every case. And we'e got plenty of 'legacy' files that don't conform to current rules. (...) Generally, a unique number for each file. If we don't know any of the numbers, then we might use s-suffixes on a (...) (22 years ago, 31-Aug-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Parts vs subparts for compound parts
|
|
Several parts consist of several bits, like metal connectors for electric parts and glass for windows and doors and compound housing (e.g. top and bottom housing). How should all the various bits be named and where should they be stored? (In (...) (22 years ago, 31-Aug-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Question about part 30147
|
|
(...) No it's not. Studs are for modelling studs only. (22 years ago, 28-Aug-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Question about part 30147
|
|
I just noticed that part 30147 does something that I haven't seen done in any other part. It uses the stud primitive in a way that is inside out. This causes a problem in LDView: (URL) Notice the Lego logos are mirrored in the headlight openings, (...) (22 years ago, 28-Aug-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
