 | | BFC problem with s/3070bs01.dat? [DAT]
|
|
The file has these lines: 0 BFC INVERTNEXT 1 16 0 8 0 6 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 6 box5.dat Is an empty line allowed after INVERTNEXT? Currently L3P complains. It takes the spec literally: 9 INVERTNEXT 9 This option inverts a subfile. It may only be used (...) (24 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC problem with 970s01.dat?
|
|
(...) insist? Did you mean await? The whole file including primitives should be BFC compliant to have the CERTIFY. (...) Yes, a NOCERTIFY can be considered as a (temporary) turn-off-BFC, and other BFC statements should silently be ignored. /Lars (24 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | m6887 Allied Avenger [DAT]
|
|
File is in MPD format. From the Blacktron II series. 0 FILE m6887.ldr 0 6887 Allied Avenger 0 Name: m6887.ldr 0 Author: John Riley <Rohnjiley@yahoo.com> 0 WRITE LDraw.org Official Model Repository 0 Official Model: ©1991 LEGO Group 0 ROTATION CENTER (...) (24 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets)
|
| |
| | m6590 Vacation Camper [DAT]
|
|
File is in MPD format. Includes x460.dat Container Suitcase by Franklin Cain (an unofficial part) 0 FILE m6590.ldr 0 6590 Vacation Camper 0 Name: m6590.ldr 0 Author: John Riley <Rohnjiley@yahoo.com> 0 Unofficial Model 0 ROTATION CENTER 0 -13 100 1 (...) (24 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets)
|
| |
| | m6655 Auto Tire Repair [DAT]
|
|
Set is in MPD format. BONUS: The alternate models from the box panels are also in this mpd. 0 FILE m6655.dat 0 6655 Auto & Tire Repair 0 Name: m6655.dat 0 Author: John Riley: Rohnjiley@yahoo.com 0 Official Model: ©1984 LEGO Group 0 ROTATION CENTER 0 (...) (24 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC problem with 970s01.dat?
|
|
(...) IIRC, my claim of making this BFC compliant was found to be incorrect when reviewed in the PT. So to expedite its release, I suspect Steve did an admin edit of the 0 BFC CERTIFY line (since we only insist on BFC compliance for primitives) to (...) (24 years ago, 18-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC problem with 970s01.dat?
|
|
(...) You're welcome. (...) I understand that every effort is made to prevent errors, and also that this will never prevent all errors. I posted the message in order to determine if this case is indeed an error. I posted to this group because I'm (...) (24 years ago, 18-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC problem with 970s01.dat?
|
|
(...) Hi travis, Thanks for LDView, Each part is carefully reviewed by volunteers in Parts Tracker. That means if a part says CERTIFY you can be pretty confident regarding its usage of BFC-ed primitives. I think errors are still possible with (...) (24 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Observatory - revised teaser pic
|
|
Hi all, Since this teasing with pics is popular, I thought I'd put one up too! Look at (URL) wait for more!!! Jaco (24 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | BFC problem with 970s01.dat?
|
|
I think part 970s01.dat has a BFC problem. I'm working on my BFC parsing in LDView, and it printed an error in this file, so I went and looked at it. At the beginning of the file, it says: 0 BFC NOCERTIFY Then later in the file, it says: 0 BFC (...) (24 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
