 | | Why aren't the technic gear teeth primitives?
|
|
I was thinking that the teeth for the old technic gears (3647-1649) and the beveled ones (32270 and 32296) should be made into primitives. I tried editing the 3648 part in ldraw, but the file was too big to even load! (25 years ago, 28-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Two questions on primitives
|
|
(...) The INVERTNEXT directive takes care of this problem. Quoted from BFC proposal: "INVERTNEXT This option inverts a subfile. It may only be used immediately before a subfile command line, and it only influences the immediately following subfile (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Two questions on primitives
|
|
Two questions (if these have already been discussed, just direct me to the appropriate LUGNET post): 1.) I've noticed the new BFC complient primitives on the Parts Tracker. How are we going to resolve the fact that the cylindar primitve can be used (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part - 2587 Knights Armor
|
|
(...) I tried this with real parts and find that there is a conflict in real life. If I put the head on the torso+armour first then add the helmet then the chin strap does not go as far below the grin as when I put the helmet on the head alone. If I (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Liftarm width
|
|
Thanks Steve, looks like a good project to recreate them with the correct width and BFC-compliants. Philo (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part : Was Re: 9V Track Crossing (32087.dat) [DAT]
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Ludo Soete writes: Hi, Here's the promissed Train Track 9V Crossing. It uses four subparts. Two of them are used in the Train Track 9V Straight, two are new. Those subfiles are: 2865s04.dat 2865s06.dat 32087s01.dat (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Liftarm width
|
|
(...) Yes, liftarm parts should be 18 LDU wide. Skinny liftarms should be 10 LDU tall, full-liftarms (aka, smooth beams) should be 20 LDU tall. Steve (25 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part - 2587 Knights Armor [DAT]
|
|
Hi all, I tested my armor in ensemble wtih a helmet and what I had to notice, there is a ovelapping with it. I looked at the real parts and I found that the helmet is in the bottom to sloping. Look here: 1 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2587.dat 1 1 0 0 (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Rubber belts modelling utility
|
|
Hi Kyle, (...) ... but I should have understood ! (...) (URL) I'll have a look at it if I find time (trigonometry is a little more tricky here...) (...) Yes, I think so too - though the two axis rotation of straight parts might not be so easy. (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 9V Track Crossing (32087.dat)
|
|
Hi, I updated my 'on the shellf' folder on Brickshellf with some new pictures from the 32087.dat part or better known as the Train Track 9V Crossing. (URL) have one question, before my first release. Go to this picture : (URL) see red ovals placed (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
