 | | Re: Primitives with different BFC winding
|
|
(...) Different winding should not be a big deal. The BFC standard requires renders to keep track of the winding direction and cull correctly. Steve (22 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Non-BFC primitives (was: Primitives with different BFC winding)
|
|
(...) I just found out what caused my notice. I had several non-bfc'd primitives overwritten with unofficial bfc'd versions. Now I have deleted all files from my P-folder and extracted all primitives from the current complete.zip (inlcuding update (...) (22 years ago, 2-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-BFC primitives (was: Primitives with different BFC winding)
|
|
Oops forgot to get the primitives from Ldraw027.exe. Please forget my previous post and read this one ;-) (...) I just found out what caused my notice. I had several non-bfc'd primitives overwritten with unofficial bfc'd versions. Now I have (...) (22 years ago, 2-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-BFC primitives (was: Primitives with different BFC winding)
|
|
(...) (don't use box3#8p - use box3u8p) (...) The only thing your part files have to deal with is whether the primitive files are being used in their default orientation, or do they need to be inverted (turned inside-out). (...) Yes, those all look (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-BFC primitives (was: Primitives with different BFC winding)
|
|
(...) I just browsed the primitives in my P folder, (including only the official primitives). I recall the discussion about renaming box3#8p to box3u8p because of the #-issue. And now the PT is back online I can see box3u8p waiting for more votes. (...) (22 years ago, 11-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
