Subject:
|
Re: Large LDraw/MPD Files?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Fri, 20 Dec 2002 13:15:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
590 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Tore Eriksson writes:
> In lugnet.cad, Tim Courtney writes:
> > Has anyone had experience with HUGE LDraw files or MPD files (thousands of
> > parts)? What are the effects? Do they crash some programs, or make them
> > unusably slow? Just curious.
>
> MLCAD is out of the question, but L3Lab is acceptable: 6.3-13 seconds,
> depending on zoom factor and other preferences. No problem with L3P, but I
> haven't even tried POV with Q>1...
Why is it that MLCad isn't appropriate for large models? Does it take a long
time, or will MLCad actually crash?
And what is the size limitation? I'm working on a fairly large model - well,
it has a large number of parts, though its overall size isn't too big. Is
there a magic file size that prompts disaster? Or a certain pieces count?
Everything's looking good so far, though it would be nice to brac myself if I
should be expecting a fiasco ...
thanks,
-s
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Large LDraw/MPD Files?
|
| (...) It will take a long time to load and if you attempt to scroll the model in the windows it will take long to do that to. (...) Nobody knows as no one has every put MLCAD thru that test. Either in FILE SIZE or insize of parts in the model. I'm (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Large LDraw/MPD Files?
|
| (...) Datsville is IMHO a HUGE model, with its 2Mb+ and several sub-models used multiple times. MLCAD is out of the question, but L3Lab is acceptable: 6.3-13 seconds, depending on zoom factor and other preferences. No problem with L3P, but I haven't (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
