Subject:
|
Re: Overlapping polygons - how bad is it?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 23:20:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
362 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Tore Eriksson writes:
> If, for example, I can use a n-4disc primitive but not a n-4ndis close to
> it, I may want to let the polygon that touches the disc overlap a bit so
> that there won't be any bleeding when the part is converted by L3P.
>
> How "bad" is that overlap (if disc and polygon share the same color, of
> course)? When does it present a problem (bigger than making the disc a polygon)?
>
>
> /Tore
IMHO it is bad if the part can exist in transparent.
Alpha-transparency makes any overlapping visible.
Otherwise it is harmless.
If you have no other solution and the part clearly exists in transparent
color(s), then "needs work" in the part name and related comment in part
code would certainly avoid any unfriendly vote in the PT.
Regards,
Damien
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Overlapping polygons - how bad is it?
|
| If, for example, I can use a n-4disc primitive but not a n-4ndis close to it, I may want to let the polygon that touches the disc overlap a bit so that there won't be any bleeding when the part is converted by L3P. How "bad" is that overlap (if disc (...) (22 years ago, 6-Nov-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
