Subject:
|
Re: Next version of LDAO
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 16:19:32 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
jsproat@geocities.com{ihatespam}
|
Viewed:
|
849 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote:
> What you've described is more-or-less what I'm planning on adding to the
> Inliner.
Cool!
> BTW, do you have any idea how big completely inlined files can get?
> They are huge.
I have a 26-line (1.53 kb) model which inlined into a 26,000-line (1.16
Mb) model. (1) Almost exactly three orders of magnatude in this case!
But the nice part is, it's not excess baggage. This is as trim as the
model gets. It could be taken anywhere without a library of parts to go
along, or parsed into just about any 3-D format without having to
convert the parts library.
Cheers,
- jsproat
(1) This includes blank lines and comments. I decided to leave them in
there for comparison purposes, 'cause that's that LDAO would be working
with. Original model had no sub-models.
--
If this is paradise, I wish I had a lawnmower.
Jeremy H. Sproat - jsproat@geocities.com
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Horizon/5249/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Next version of LDAO
|
| (...) What you've described is more-or-less what I'm planning on adding to the Inliner. (...) Except right now, the Editor probably deselects the code after inlining. This will be fixed in the next release. BTW, do you have any idea how big (...) (26 years ago, 27-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
