 | | Next version of LDAO
|
| Steve, Earlier, I made a request for a one-button "Inline All" feature for LDAO. I was wondering if this could be implemented to allow the user to (a) inline all sub-models, (b) inline all sub-models and parts, and/or (c) inline all sub-models and (...) (26 years ago, 26-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: Next version of LDAO
|
| (...) What you've described is more-or-less what I'm planning on adding to the Inliner. (...) Except right now, the Editor probably deselects the code after inlining. This will be fixed in the next release. BTW, do you have any idea how big (...) (26 years ago, 27-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: Next version of LDAO
|
| (...) Just look at an L3P output file to get an idea of how huge. And L3P doesn't even inline many of the primitives. -John Van (26 years ago, 27-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: Next version of LDAO
|
| (...) Cool! (...) I have a 26-line (1.53 kb) model which inlined into a 26,000-line (1.16 Mb) model. (1) Almost exactly three orders of magnatude in this case! But the nice part is, it's not excess baggage. This is as trim as the model gets. It (...) (26 years ago, 27-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: Next version of LDAO
|
| This seemed like as good a place as any to report LDAO bugs. I found that the rotate function doesn't work on type 2 lines, in fact it crashes the whole program. Perhaps you can't make it rotate type 2 lines, but if it could avoid crashing... On (...) (26 years ago, 28-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: Next version of LDAO
|
| (...) Hey, you're right. Thank you very much for catching this -- it should work on any linetype. Turns out it could any linetype with 4 points/vectors. Less than that, and it would croak. That's what I get for employing the cut&paste method of code (...) (26 years ago, 29-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
| |
