 | | Re: Another house for datville?
|
|
(...) Ooops. I missed that. (...) I suggest Datsville should be put on ice (what's the other figure of speech? Put up for preservation? I can't remember...) and new subdivisions/communities be created in a similar way, connected by road, rail, and (...) (23 years ago, 18-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Another house for datville?
|
|
Not to sound rude, but I thought the whole reason behind Tore's initiative to reduce filesize was because these *large* model files were choking people's compuers? Like real realestate, there is a supply and demand to building "Datsvilles". When (...) (23 years ago, 18-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Another LDrawn town (Was: Another house for datville?)
|
|
Mike: (...) I think that is a correct interpretation. But once Tore gets the interpreted POV-Ray file below 1 Gb, we can start adding more buildings to the town. ;-) I like the idea of "going west" and creating another town, but I am not sure I like (...) (23 years ago, 19-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Another LDrawn town (Was: Another house for datville?)
|
|
(...) I'm more interested in the methods he used, so that I can replicate it. (...) I think growing interest via this method might be exponential, instead of linear (as is true of the current method). (...) I really think that would be a better idea (...) (23 years ago, 10-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Another LDrawn town (Was: Another house for datville?)
|
|
(...) I'm still working on different methods, comparing the results, and trying to automize the as far as possible. (...) In my (coming) animated version(s) of Datville, it will be anything but static! :o) Btw, that means a lot of splitting files = (...) (23 years ago, 11-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
