 | | Re: Is it appropriate to post large models here?
|
|
(...) It's not, no, and I think there have been a couple large parts that were converted from some other format that were in the neighborhood of that size. --Todd (24 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Is it appropriate to post large models here?
|
|
(...) The high detail versions of the 8880 wheels where quite large. Surprisingly, the largest part I have in my collection is the floating astronaut picture piece. (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Is it appropriate to post large models here?
|
|
(...) Large part files I can understand. I know that (generally) means there are better ways of organizing the file, but some parts can be huge. But models are hard to make large. :) Steve (24 years ago, 6-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Is it appropriate to post large models here?
|
|
(...) Yikes! That is big. From what Todd said before, a one-time posting of a large DAT would be alright. From his POV. That makes me think: is there a BMP2DAT program that uses the direct-color syntax of LDLite & MLCad? Having RGB colors available (...) (24 years ago, 15-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Is it appropriate to post large models here?
|
|
Hello, (...) direct-color (...) Hm... from my point of view that doesn't make a real difference. (As you probably know ;) I wrote BMP-2-LDraw32). In some cases you wil get even a bigger file than before because the number from 1-511 (about 300 (...) (24 years ago, 15-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Is it appropriate to post large models here?
|
|
(...) Hmm. (a) I wasn't very clear and (b) I didn't think about compressing DAT size by combining adjacent pixels with the same color. Anyway, I was thinking that with more colors, the source BMP could be smaller (in pixel x pixel dimensions) and (...) (24 years ago, 15-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
