Subject:
|
Re: Datsville Update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Thu, 9 Sep 1999 18:08:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
513 times
|
| |
|
|
On Thu, 9 Sep 1999 16:13:02 GMT, "John VanZwieten"
<john_vanzwieten@email.msn.com> wrote:
> From Bram's pov file:
> #declare r_w=2800; // width of river heightfield
> #declare r_b=80; // height of river bank
> #declare r_d=240; // depth of river
Yeouch! Are those LDU's? The river's over 4 baseplates wide! Must be the
Mississippi. Maybe I'll have to rethink this as a suspension bridge.
Good thing it's not downtown, or there wouldn't *be* a downtown.
> I'm not sure if 2800 is the width of the water or of the river+banks, but I
> imagine Bram could clue us in.
What about r_d? Is 240 the height from the bottom of the river to the
water level, or all the way to the top of the bank?
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Datsville Update
|
| (...) Hmm. I may have to mess with that a bit. I want to go with something more like 30 studs across. Have you seen the new bridge they're building in London? It was in a recent edition of Popular Science. The deck of the bridge curves out over the (...) (25 years ago, 9-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Datsville Update
|
| From Bram's pov file: #declare r_w=2800; // width of river heightfield #declare r_b=80; // height of river bank #declare r_d=240; // depth of river I'm not sure if 2800 is the width of the water or of the river+banks, but I imagine Bram could clue (...) (25 years ago, 9-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
