Subject:
|
Re: Datsville Update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Thu, 9 Sep 1999 16:13:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
576 times
|
| |
|
|
From Bram's pov file:
#declare r_w=2800; // width of river heightfield
#declare r_b=80; // height of river bank
#declare r_d=240; // depth of river
I'm not sure if 2800 is the width of the water or of the river+banks, but I
imagine Bram could clue us in.
-John Van
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:37d7d601.99324349@lugnet.com...
> On Thu, 9 Sep 1999 00:47:40 GMT, "John VanZwieten"
> <john_vanzwieten@msn.com> wrote:
>
> > Who's going to design a bridge over the river?
>
> How wide's river, and what's the vertical distance from the top of the
> riverbank to the water's surface?
>
> Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Datsville Update
|
| (...) Yeouch! Are those LDU's? The river's over 4 baseplates wide! Must be the Mississippi. Maybe I'll have to rethink this as a suspension bridge. Good thing it's not downtown, or there wouldn't *be* a downtown. (...) What about r_d? Is 240 the (...) (25 years ago, 9-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Datsville Update
|
| (...) How wide's river, and what's the vertical distance from the top of the riverbank to the water's surface? Steve (25 years ago, 9-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
