 | | Re: Instead of ~Moved to —Tore Eriksson
|
| | | (...) <SNIP> (...) The problem is that it doesn't. As I pointed out in my latest post, (URL) , almost every single existing LDraw model file ever made needs to be updated with every parts update realeasd. That has absolutely nothing to do with true (...) (14 years ago, 20-Jan-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Instead of ~Moved to —Orion Pobursky
|
| | | | | (...) I don't understand what you're saying here, Tore. The ~Moved To files prevent the need to update already existing files by providing a back reference to the old part number. This prevents a part from disappearing from a model simply because (...) (14 years ago, 20-Jan-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Instead of ~Moved to —Chris Dee
|
| | | | (...) I was going to start my response with "I don't understand", but Orion beat me to it. It is absolutely not necessary to update existing models with the replacement file referred to by the "~Moved to" file, but maybe I am missing something about (...) (14 years ago, 20-Jan-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Instead of ~Moved to —Allen Smith
|
| | | | In lugnet.cad, Chris Dee wrote: snip (...) The zip archive's chief virtue is not its familiarity, but its cross-platform portability. It's very important to maintain that. (...) I fixed that Bricksmith bug about a year and a half ago, so you don't (...) (14 years ago, 22-Jan-10, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Instead of ~Moved to —Chris Dee
|
| | | | In lugnet.cad, Allen Smith wrote: <SNIP> (...) Depending on their viewpoint and experience with LDraw, different users might argue that either inclusion OR exlclusion can be confusing. By including both in the library and providing a way to identify (...) (14 years ago, 25-Jan-10, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| | | | |
