 | | Re: DATHeader Update (The Reviewer Tool) Version 2.0.6
|
|
(...) I'm not going to try to convince you one way or another, but it seems to me that if you were to do something like this, Peeron would be a more logical choice as the source of the information, since Peeron and ldraw.org are much more closely (...) (15 years ago, 30-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: DATHeader Update (The Reviewer Tool) Version 2.0.6
|
|
(...) You are right, but also with Peeron the above mentioned problems still exists. So using Peeron will not be an option either. cu mikeheide (15 years ago, 30-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: DATHeader Update (The Reviewer Tool) Version 2.0.6
|
|
(...) My main source for names is Peeron and I use BL only if there is no Peeron reference. Nonetheless I don't think that naming should be automated: * Peeron has no limit on characters * It has no scheme for pattern, component parts, shortcuts, (...) (15 years ago, 1-Jul-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: DATHeader Update (The Reviewer Tool) Version 2.0.6
|
|
(...) Thats correct and also do not forget that LDraw has its own numbering scheme and Peeron may change their numbers if an LDraw part is released. It might be possible to get the names as a reference or an idea but I think also everybody has a (...) (15 years ago, 1-Jul-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
