 | | Re: Undercarriage
|
|
(I thought I already answered but don't see the message appear...) (...) That's what I do too. But I keep a pure official library in a separate folder. I use this as LDraw library path for MPD wizard while my regular LDraw folder is the unofficial (...) (17 years ago, 27-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Next parts update?
|
|
(...) Great! Thanks for your effort, Chris! Jaco (17 years ago, 24-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Undercarriage
|
|
(...) That's what I do too. But I have in another folder an intact official library. When I run MPD Wizard, I use this reference lib as the LDraw library, and my regular LDraw folder as unofficial parts path. Philo (17 years ago, 27-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Still no zip file for 2008-01?
|
|
(...) On further investigation, it is now clear why I did this. All three files are obsolete and not used by any official parts and as primitives/subparts should not be directly referenced in models. Because this update was a complete library (...) (17 years ago, 27-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Undercarriage
|
|
(...) Thanks! (...) I did try MPD Wizard but it didn't really work... perhaps because I've got the unofficial parts mixed with the official parts? I know it's bad to do it that way but if I put them into a separate directory (I can pretty easily (...) (17 years ago, 25-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Still no zip file for 2008-01?
|
|
(...) Thanks for pointing this out. I don't understand how those files got to become zero-length, but these will be restored in the next parts update (which is under development at present). Chris Dee (LDraw Parts Library Admin) (17 years ago, 27-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Undercarriage
|
|
Hi Santeri, (...) A very nice model! (...) I would put it in your Majhost gallery (because of the close relationship with Brickshelf I see no reason why it would not be allowed. eg. the TOS is the same...) Try to include all unofficial parts in the (...) (17 years ago, 25-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | MiniBots
|
|
Hi, my son Sandro and I started to do instructions for our minibots. Since the last upload eight are already available after moderation. (URL) The picture is a link to the gallery (as soon as moderated). Only two of them are mine, guess which :-) (...) (17 years ago, 16-Apr-09, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: SR 3D Builder user manual
|
|
(...) The keyboard is usually much faster than the mouse, and I have all the commands memorized already (as do most people who use MLCAD, because it uses the same commands). -Mike (17 years ago, 15-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: SR 3D Builder user manual
|
|
(...) Hi, I don't ever try lEdit so I think it doesn't. Anyway you should not need keyboard to position parts, and my program is totally different! Sergio (17 years ago, 15-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: SR 3D Builder user manual
|
|
(...) I will have to try it soon. Question: does the program support LEdit's keyboard commands? -Mike (17 years ago, 15-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Purpose of physical colour parts
|
|
(...) Mike, if you're really looking for part to take of there are loads waiting for you: (URL) (17 years ago, 14-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: SR 3D Builder user manual
|
|
(...) Excellent news! thanks! Philo (17 years ago, 14-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | SR 3D Builder user manual
|
|
Hi everybody I finally published a preliminar (and not fully revised) version of the SR 3D Builder User Manual You can download from application website homepage in .PDF format (URL) this will help. Sergio (17 years ago, 14-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Purpose of physical colour parts
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Matthew J. Chiles <mattchiles@gorge.net> wrote: SNIP (...) SNIP Reviewing is not a big deal for most parts. Please see a good (but not at the current stage) tutorial here: (URL) am with you if you like to have more reviewers on the (...) (17 years ago, 13-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Purpose of physical colour parts
|
|
(...) Sorry Matt but this is cheap. Everyone who has the skills to author a part has all that's needed to review one. Instead of blaiming the reviewers go and ask for review rights - it might takes hours to review a part but it takes less than (...) (17 years ago, 13-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Purpose of physical colour parts [DAT]
|
|
(...) Allen, I agree with you and would go a step further: I cannot see any benefit to have alias parts for transparent and opaque parts, but all this is the territory of the PT admins and I'm not going to mess around in their corner of the sandbox. (...) (17 years ago, 13-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Purpose of physical colour parts
|
|
(...) Amen! Preach it Brother Allen! I agree with you on all fronts. In the good news department - a part I first submitted 3 1/2 years ago (40375) finally got certified this weekend. But the pace of output for this stuff in painfully slow, and (...) (17 years ago, 13-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Purpose of physical colour parts
|
|
(...) Unfortunately, I missed this discussion and haven't stumbled on the magic search phrase to dig it up again. It strikes me that creating hard-colored parts for every part/color permutation Lego ever has or ever will produce has a number of (...) (17 years ago, 13-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Purpose of physical colour parts
|
|
(...) I couldn't find anything revelant by searching LUGNET, but I do see sense in this... though if enough numbers were found, parts/ directory one day would contain more of PC parts rather than real parts. Wouldn't it make more sense to at least (...) (17 years ago, 12-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
