Subject:
|
Re: Purpose of physical colour parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:20:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
8365 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Matthew J. Chiles <mattchiles@gorge.net> wrote:
> I've got another part (55423) in the system that has only 1 certify
> vote after almost 2 years (thank you Philo), and it is an extremely
> useful part that people actually need. Perhaps the reviewers are
> afraid to take the time - I know I would be if I were a reviewer. The
> stakes are too high with the way the bar is currently set - the
> commitment to properly review a part is hours per part.
Sorry Matt but this is cheap. Everyone who has the skills to author a part has
all that's needed to review one. Instead of blaiming the reviewers go and ask
for review rights - it might takes hours to review a part but it takes less than
author one.
> It would be better I think to look at the part from a wide angle and
> send it through... if there are no glaring errors probably nobody will
> ever notice them. If the little errors are ever a problem for anyone,
> then can be fixed later as they are noticed. But in the mean time
> there is another official part for people to use.
This is already possible:
http://news.lugnet.com/announce/?n=3442
w.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Purpose of physical colour parts
|
| (...) Amen! Preach it Brother Allen! I agree with you on all fronts. In the good news department - a part I first submitted 3 1/2 years ago (40375) finally got certified this weekend. But the pace of output for this stuff in painfully slow, and (...) (16 years ago, 13-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
