Subject:
|
Re: Purpose of physical colour parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:57:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
8787 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.cad, Matthew J. Chiles <mattchiles@gorge.net> wrote:
SNIP
> I've got another part (55423) in the system that has only 1 certify
> vote after almost 2 years (thank you Philo), and it is an extremely
> useful part that people actually need. Perhaps the reviewers are
> afraid to take the time - I know I would be if I were a reviewer. The
> stakes are too high with the way the bar is currently set - the
> commitment to properly review a part is hours per part.
>
> It would be better I think to look at the part from a wide angle and
> send it through... if there are no glaring errors probably nobody will
> ever notice them. If the little errors are ever a problem for anyone,
> then can be fixed later as they are noticed. But in the mean time
> there is another official part for people to use.
SNIP
Reviewing is not a big deal for most parts.
Please see a good (but not at the current stage) tutorial here:
http://www.l3go.bugge.com/articles/Reviewing-parts-tutorial.shtml
I am with you if you like to have more reviewers on the PT.
I also often read the sentence like "could benefit from using..." and a novote.
I feel that there should be made a certify or hold in that cases because if the
author don't correct his part within 3 month you can correct that error without
permission!
Often I had use this procedere to push some parts that had long time only such
messages.
cu
mikeheide
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Purpose of physical colour parts
|
| (...) Amen! Preach it Brother Allen! I agree with you on all fronts. In the good news department - a part I first submitted 3 1/2 years ago (40375) finally got certified this weekend. But the pace of output for this stuff in painfully slow, and (...) (16 years ago, 13-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
10 Messages in This Thread: ![Purpose of physical colour parts -Santeri Piippo (11-Apr-09 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Purpose of physical colour parts -Michael Heidemann (11-Apr-09 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Purpose of physical colour parts -Santeri Piippo (12-Apr-09 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Purpose of physical colour parts -Allen Smith (13-Apr-09 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Purpose of physical colour parts -Matthew J. Chiles <mattchiles@gorge.net> (13-Apr-09 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Purpose of physical colour parts -Willy Tschager (13-Apr-09 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Purpose of physical colour parts -Willy Tschager (14-Apr-09 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Purpose of physical colour parts -Michael Heidemann (23-May-09 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Purpose of physical colour parts -Willy Tschager (13-Apr-09 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|