Computer Aided Design : 16158

CAD / 16158

16157 | 16159

Subject:	Re: Purpose of physical colour parts
Newsgroups:	lugnet.cad
Date:	Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:39:09 GMT
Viewed:	13649 times

In lugnet.cad, Michael Heidemann wrote: > I feel that there should be made a certify or hold in that cases because if the > author don't correct his part within 3 month you can correct that error without > permission! > > Often I had use this procedere to push some parts that had long time only such > messages. Mike, if you're really looking for part to take of there are loads waiting for you: http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/71972.dat http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/x899.dat http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/30263.dat http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/3004p07.dat http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/6162.dat http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/33230.dat http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/6161.dat http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/6007.dat ... w.

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Purpose of physical colour parts
(...) I would have correct that parts if I would own them. As you know as an author you need to have the part, as a reviewer you don't need to have the part. cu mikeheide (17 years ago, 23-May-09, to lugnet.cad)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Purpose of physical colour parts
In lugnet.cad, Matthew J. Chiles <mattchiles@gorge.net> wrote: SNIP (...) SNIP Reviewing is not a big deal for most parts. Please see a good (but not at the current stage) tutorial here: (URL) am with you if you like to have more reviewers on the (...) (17 years ago, 13-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad)

10 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact