 | | Re: LGEO update
|
|
(...) Nevermind. The problem was that the beta version of L3P needs to be installed. There's no mention of this on your site. -Mike (17 years ago, 29-Nov-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LGEO update
|
|
(...) L3PAO complains when I direct it to the location of this archive. Are there any incompatibilities between the two I should worry about? -Mike (17 years ago, 29-Nov-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw (and LDraw.org) questions
|
|
(...) Awesome! Thanks! -Mike (17 years ago, 29-Nov-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Mesh Enhancer?
|
|
(...) Could you please send me a copy as well? The whole domain where the site was hosted seems to be down. -Mike (17 years ago, 29-Nov-08, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Unified installer
|
|
(...) Ah, I clicked on the "Download" link (bolded) on the ldraw.org sidebar and didn't see it anywhere. It is listed in the "Getting Started" section instead. -Mike (17 years ago, 29-Nov-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Unified installer
|
|
(...) The LDRAW ALL-IN-ONE-INSATLLER does this already. The user gets to choose 1 of 3 options. 1) BASIC install which installed LDRAW Part libary, MLCAD, and LDVIEW 2) INTERMEDIATE which installs BASIC + L3P, L3PA, LPUB, LGEO and POV-Ray 3.1g and (...) (17 years ago, 28-Nov-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Unified installer
|
|
(...) This problem has been indintified a long ago, but a quick solution was blocked by the fact that several of the included part files are historicly not licenced for distribution in another form then included within the original LDraw Package. In (...) (17 years ago, 26-Nov-08, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Unified installer
|
|
I think the way that the LDraw utilities are installed is a bit complicated for novice users, especially children or parents of children. Essentially, the current scheme asks users to first install the resources required by the software, and *then* (...) (17 years ago, 25-Nov-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinions needed for Color and Edge Values
|
|
(...) I completely agree that changing the colour codes at this stage is a terrible idea. However I have nothing against duplicating them. One thing we do need is to maintain, alongside the LDraw codes, mapping lists to other known systems such as (...) (17 years ago, 25-Nov-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinions needed for Color and Edge Values
|
|
(...) Since MLCAD (and other programs) do not support color codes above 511, a different approach to reading TLG colors is needed. However, I have to strongly agree with Philo. Changing color codes that have been defined for years is not a good (...) (17 years ago, 25-Nov-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
