| |
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Timothy Gould wrote:
> Some quick answers...
>
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Jim DeVona wrote:
> > The new minimum-entries rule has inspired me to enter the LDraw.org Model of the
> > Month contest. I have a few questions:
>
> Excellent. Thanks.
>
> > 1. Should entries that use unofficial parts (real LEGO parts that are not yet
> > LDraw certified) include those parts in the MPD file? I know there is no rule
> > requiring this, but I am curious if it would be helpful.
>
> You should include the unofficial parts as submodels.
OK. I will probably do this.
> > 2. Does the rule against official LEGO models and box art-inspired models apply • ;> to entirely custom alternate models as well? (By "alternate models" I mean
> > "MOCs" created only with pieces from a single set.)
>
> So long as you invent it then it's yours to submit. We don't want someone to
> post an MPD of the alternative model shown on the back of the box, other than
> that it's up to you what parts you use.
Right. Sounds good.
> > I assume for the purpose of the contest, if not in general, the answer to the
> > question I pose at http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dev/?n=10660 is that submodel
> > names should indeed be conservatively treated as filenames.
>
> Probably best to be conservative. I don't think your entry would be vetoed if
> you weren't but the less risk of extra work we (actually just Willy) have to do
> the happier we'll be.
Ha, a good point! Sounds like LDView is used for the contest renders, so it
probably wouldn't be a problem, but I am going to stick with simple names.
> > One incidental point I would like to make about MOTM voting is that to me, the
> > composition of an LDraw file is as important as the screenshot in judging how
> > "good" the model is ... I propose that the contestant LDraw files be made available to
> > voters as part of the ballot. ...
>
> That's an interesting point and one which we will certainly take into account.
> Expect some work behind the scenes on this (although possibly not a lot given
> other more pressing issues).
OK. I realize there are mixed feelings on the topic, so I can't expect the
LDraw.org committees to come to a conclusion promptly. As long as I've triggered
some discussion I'm content.
Jim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
