Subject:
|
Re: LDraw Official Model Repository (OMR)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Tue, 19 Dec 2006 00:10:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1701 times
|
| |
|
|
> > I'm going to start development on the LDraw.org OMR. Currently
> > I'm in the brainstorming and idea phase of the project. Here's my
> > ideas:
Ok, this shows how clueless I am, but what language will it be? Will
it be part of the postnuke framework? Is it PHP?
> > - Automated submission via forms
> > - Submissions moderated prior to inclusion in the database
Ok, I'm not promising, but I actually may like to do that.
Especially if I get to deny submissions because it was modeled
badly. :D Or at least be able to give it a grade (I don't really
want to deny everything, but would like to be able to improve model
submissions if possible).
> > - Automatic previw image generation
> > - Searchable via theme, set title, set number, etc..
> > - Cross links to Peeron inventories
> >
> > Questions:
> > - How to handle unofficial parts
> >
> > Your ideas, requests, suggestions?
>
> Should it allow for multiple versions of the same set? Seems mean
> if 2 people
> both happen to have done the same set not to be able to credit them
> both. And
> there's the problem of who decides which one is "best" anyway.
I think multiple versions is a good idea. Maybe it would also reduce
multiple versions since people will notice the set is already created.
> Maybe it could be like brickset too, where viewers can add
> comments. Though they
> would have to be moderated too, increasing the workload for
> moderators.
Sounds cool.
> And what about partial sets? Someone may decide they want to submit
> (e.g.) the
> B-Wing, but not it's stand, or 1 vehicle in a multi vehicle set.
> Should that be
> possible?
Why not. Maybe there should be 3 categories:
- Lego official sets, LDraw official
- Lego official sets, non-LDraw official
- MOC
> And as well as the auto-preview, people should be able to submit
> their own
> renders.
What about vr objects or movies? Is there server space to store that
stuff? I always thought vr objects were much better ways to view
models, and they are really easy to create if you know how.
And has anyone thought of writing something that allows a person to
create an image preview in a webapp?
> As far as unofficial parts go, I don't see any problem allowing
> them, unless
> it's difficult to make them available to the auto-image generator -
> it looks
> like the most common viewers and editors are all starting to get
> auto part
> download functionality, so as far as the user is concerned, it
> should all get
> handled after they retrieve the file.
A lot of MOC's include the unofficial parts they use as well,
especially since sometimes they will change. So it uses what it was
created with.
Ok, and I'm showing my favoritism for Anton Raves library, but we
could also generate POV-Ray files for submissions too, using L3P and
Anton's converter. I'm not sure he would like that or not, but just
an idea.
James
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LDraw Official Model Repository (OMR)
|
| (...) Presumably, yes. (...) Yes (...) That's great. I'm not sure I'd want to reject a legitimate submission outright but it could be assign a "need work" tag. I'm also not interested in making the OMR like the Parts Tracker. In other words, I want (...) (18 years ago, 19-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LDraw Official Model Repository (OMR)
|
| (...) Should it allow for multiple versions of the same set? Seems mean if 2 people both happen to have done the same set not to be able to credit them both. And there's the problem of who decides which one is "best" anyway. Maybe it could be like (...) (18 years ago, 18-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
