 | | Re: 1x1 and 2x2 chess sets
|
|
(...) Affirmative to both. Though, to be safe, you might want to prod my memory when the time comes. Question, do the other cones have that problem? -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 3-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: 1x1 and 2x2 chess sets
|
|
(...) Okey-doke. (...) The problem is with the primitive being used. I used the 1-4con3.dat file, the translation of which is improperly written by L3P. Presumably, any part using this primitive will render incorrectly. Currently, there's only one: (...) (26 years ago, 3-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: 1x1 and 2x2 chess sets
|
|
(...) I checked this part with L3P this morning. What I got was: (...) I can't find an error in these lines, except they zero out the y component to turn a conic into a ring. Does POV-Ray not work with this type of transformation matrix? (or: did I (...) (26 years ago, 3-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: 1x1 and 2x2 chess sets
|
|
(...) Good answer, but not the one I was looking for. :-) What I meant to ask is: do the current cones need to get the same/similar fix as the 1x1 cone? -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 3-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: 1x1 and 2x2 chess sets
|
|
(...) Oh, definitely. Haven't looked at many cone parts in L3P, have you? The 3x3x2 cone especially needs extensive work. Steve (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | 3x3 cone availability
|
|
(...) What? (DING DING DING DING DING going off in my head) Is the 3x3 cone available in LDraw yet? Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: 3x3 cone availability
|
|
(...) YHBT. Steve (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: 3x3 cone availability
|
|
(...) ? Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: 3x3 cone availability
|
|
(...) You Have Been Trolled. (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: 3x3 cone availability
|
|
(...) :-D :-D :-D Yah, I fell for it. Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: 1x1 and 2x2 chess sets
|
|
(...) Nope, that's why I asked you. (...) Good thing I read Sproat's replies first. :-) -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: 1x1 and 2x2 chess sets
|
|
(...) I don't know if the other cones will be as easy to fix as the 1x1x1. But I think they will (the main complication would be if the conic surface was interrupted by some feature). (...) Too bad; that one was aimed at you. ;) Steve (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
