 | | Re: Un-Official Part: 30357
|
|
Don't shred me for this question, but what did you use to design the part? I just learned of MLCAD's existence yesterday and I already want to dabble with the parts.... a point in the right direction, please? thanks Karim <knassar@mindspring.com> (...) (25 years ago, 27-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Mech [DAT]
|
|
Hi everybody, this is light combat mech I built some time ago. The mech comes with a pulse rifle that has a grenade launcher on the front bottom, this rifle attaches to the back two clips for easy carrying. My goal for this mech was to make it easy (...) (25 years ago, 26-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | New Part : Technic 4.5V Motor [DAT]
|
|
Here is my representation of the Technic 4.5V Motor. Although I have not been able to dismantle this part, I have coded it at three files - the Casing, the Core and the Shaft. Hidden surfaces are shown in black. Chris 0 FILE 769.dat 0 MPD Author: (...) (25 years ago, 26-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: How to break up multi-dat files?
|
|
(...) Some means of requesting a cache refresh would be very useful for those times when I use MLCad to review parts I am authoring. Most time the automatic LDLite window provided by LDAO is OK, but occasionally I need to see several views and MLCad (...) (25 years ago, 24-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: How to break up multi-dat files?
|
|
I'd be happy with no refresh or a manual refresh on submodel images... it's fast enough to go out and come back in, that doing that would be good enough. Most of the time when I actually care about the images for submodels it's because I built all (...) (25 years ago, 24-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | 8440 alt model mod [DAT]
|
|
Hi all! Here's a modification to the alternate model of 8440. The alternate model is a hotrod, with an engine in the front driven by the rear wheels. Now, the axle that transfers this power runs over the seat of the driver and passenger! Eek! That (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.ideas)
|
| |
| | Re: How to break up multi-dat files?
|
|
Currently MlCad scannes a .dat file on its first access and cashes its data, these data are used for the preview which is not a problem since the data of a dat file do not change (at least not for MLCad during run-time). But the sub-models you (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: converting BMP's to *.DAT help
|
|
1 pixel of your image corresponds to one stud. Michael Michael Horvath wrote in message ... (...) correlation (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Viewing DAT files from my browser?
|
|
(...) Yes you can, by using LDLite. LDLite is a windows DAT file viewer that runs off your existing LDraw parts library. At the moment, Paul Gyugyi's LDLite page is down as he tried to get his site back online. I thought there was an ldraw.org (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | MOTM Voting Online
|
|
Voting for the January ldraw.org Model of the Month competition is now online. -Tim Courtney ldraw.org Project Coordinator (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Ledit to POV-ray
|
|
Dear all i am new to converting files from dat to pov-ray and when i try to convert i get messages like could not find box5.dat referenced to ... also when i render my images in pov-ray i only get the boblles on the bricks and i do not get the whole (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Viewing DAT files from my browser?
|
|
Is there a way to view LDraw DAT files that are posted to models directly from a web browser? To state it more clearly... I am using IE 5 to read LUGNET in it's web based format. Is there a way I can "read" the DAT files people post on the fly, or (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | B-Wing Fighter, Combat Mode (MOC) [DAT]
|
|
Well, with the release of the Official A-Wing and B-Wing models, I thought I'd repost the MOCs I made earlier this year. This is my B-Wing (Combat Mode), which is almost perfectly to scale. Enjoy! Jeff 0 B-Wing Fighter, Attack Position 0 Name: (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | B-Wing Fighter, Flight Mode (MOC) [DAT]
|
|
Well, with the release of the Official A-Wing and B-Wing models, I thought I'd repost the MOCs I made earlier this year. This is my B-Wing (Flight Mode), which is almost perfectly to scale. Enjoy! Jeff 0 Star Wars B-Wing Fighter, Flight Mode 0 Name: (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | A-Wing Fighter (MOC) [DAT]
|
|
Well, with the release of the Official A-Wing and B-Wing models, I thought I'd repost the MOCs I made earlier this year. I'm starting with my A-Wing, which is slightly larger than scale. Enjoy! Jeff 0 A-Wing Fighter 0 Name: ~AWing2.dat 0 Author: (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: ldraw.org General Update, Added Press & Awards
|
|
(...) Possibly. You could always ask. If not, just put up a page for it on your website when you make it. (...) Soon...probably in the next few days. There's a Parts Reference ready to go up, but we gotta get final approval on re-publication of it (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: ldraw.org General Update, Added Press & Awards
|
|
(...) about (...) cool (...) on (...) slot (...) it. I agree. The only way it fits into the ldraw.org page is that the image is pov-rayed. I think that Lugnet would be a much more appropriate place for it but I doubt Todd would go for it. Ryan PS I (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: ldraw.org General Update, Added Press & Awards
|
|
(...) :) (...) Sounds like a nice idea. The only think I see that might be strange about it is the feature article section IMO should focus on Lego CAD items, cool new LDraw stuff, new standards, etc. Steve, Jacob, and I were planning on putting up (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: ldraw.org General Update, Added Press & Awards
|
|
(...) well (...) site has (...) cluttered (...) Topics (...) Awards. (...) in (...) rail (...) him and (...) COOL!! I'll have to check it out later. (...) Hopefully (...) has (...) If you really want to get rid of the MLCad article(personlly I'm (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
(...) Nope, not a joke. I seriously didn't remember the reason(s) why other approaches wouldn't work as well as INVERTNEXT. I poked around old messages a little bit, I think I remember better now. Let me (attempt to) explain: When this whole BFC (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
