 | | Re: C&C Hummvee (repost)
|
|
(...) I made lots of changes to all of them, especially the APC -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: New dat file: 6041 Aquazone Propeller
|
|
You little beuty! -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Question about parts
|
|
Hello all, I just took my first dip into the waters of LEGO cad, using MLCad. I was wondering where I can find a list of the parts that are currently under development. I would like to make some Aquazone-based creations, and there are a few pieces I (...) (25 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | part request. bad link.. new link
|
|
(URL) (25 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | part # request.
|
|
does anyone have this part in there lego collection? < www.geocities.com/tb...k-part.gif > I amcurrently modeling this part, and was wondering part # (25 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | 48 stud high cube double door boxcar [DAT]
|
|
a variation of my original railcar, thistime, with a new frame design. parts missing/not ready - 5.ldd -decorated 1 x 6 template (ldd.exe) 4215-.dat upper left area. will have LN written on it has "low" style bogies,and prototypical coupler housing (...) (25 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | large vs tall things (was: Re: does datsville need jobs?i think i have the answer)
|
|
(...) Do you mean me? Eric McCarthy? The top floor of the observation tower I brought to the Baylug meeting was about 68 bricks high, with the flag about 12 above that. But there are huge Lego towers that make it into the Guiness book of world (...) (25 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: MLCad wishlist
|
|
(...) I agree big time here! I really want that ability as well. It should be able to combine the subfiles with the main dat file and tally up the total parts list without having to change the file from an MPD to a DAT. (...) Maybe he has to be like (...) (25 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Shuttle
|
|
(...) Thanks for the nice comment Bram! Anyway, regarding the piece positioning, you are very absolutely correct. I really should download the newest version of MLCAD, but I'm too lazy.;>) Thanks again! Mladen Pejic (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: C&C Hummvee (repost)
|
|
Jonathon, is there any reason you reposted all these models? I saw them the first time around... --Bram (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Shuttle
|
|
(...) Looks nice! (...) -3.33067e-015 is *very* close to zero, and should actually be replaced with 0. I think the most recent version of MLCAD solved this problem? --Bram (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: MLCad wishlist
|
|
(...) maybe I'm confusing myself. at different times I have different needs. During model design it is handy to have many subfiles as you can segment your work. When I am all done with a model, I'd like to take the MPD and create a model file from (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Timmy?
|
|
(...) I was afraid of this; I've made myself seem like a troll! Actually, I thought it would be fun to generate a Timmy fig, if only to pose it in a bunch of harrowing situations... Dave! (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Old Parts replaced by Newer Versions?
|
|
(...) I'd say functionally-different variants are pretty important. Jamie's example of the "Plate 1 x 1 with Clip Light" is one example of an important variation. An example that has been discussed at length on L-CAD and lugnet.cad.dev at length. (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MLCad wishlist (was Re: Ice Cream
|
|
(...) Right now (MLCAD 1.5), you can right-click a view, and change *that window* to one of the standard views. But you can't add new view-definitions, like "upside down" or "right-front-below" (aka, pit-crew view angle). LDAO allows these types of (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: swept wings
|
|
(...) Cool! But things like this should go into .cad.dat.ideas. :) Jeff (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Clone DATs--any interest?
|
|
(...) Aha! I don't remember that pain, but that sounds about right! That would certainly explain why that double-tube plate made parts connected to it so difficult to pull apart! :-( --Todd [followups to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands] (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: Clone DATs--any interest?
|
|
(...) I believe that would take care of the problem. CSTUD.DAT wouldn't be recognized by LDraw and LEdit as anything special--these two programs recognize files named stud*.dat as special files; LDraw substitutes stu2*.dat when the fast draw option (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Clone DATs--any interest?
|
|
(...) I'd say, brickwise, Tyco's biggest problem is they didn't round off the edges of the bricks. You thought it hurt to step on *LEGO* bricks? Those Tyco pieces were doubly painful. Also, the lack of rounding made it hard to pry the pieces apart. (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: Clone DATs--any interest?
|
|
(...) It's funny you should mention that; I had the same thought once I'd downloaded the latest version of L3P and started messing around with the quality settings. If I were to use a CSTUD.DAT file, what would have to be different about it for L3P (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
