Subject:
|
large vs tall things (was: Re: does datsville need jobs?i think i have the answer)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad, lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:42:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1075 times
|
| |
|
|
> I would have to guess that when they get that big, it would probably be more
> fair to go by weight as a judge. How else could one compare something like
> Eric Harberdasher's (sorry Eric, I couldn't remember your last name) tall
> creations, like Alice in Wonderland, to sprawling short layouts. Also, if you
> only measure the highest and widest points, a few 1x600x2 walls intersecting
> with a 4x4x200 brick tower would be huge in shear dimensions, but in actuality
> pretty small.
Do you mean me? Eric McCarthy? The top floor of the observation
tower I brought to the Baylug meeting was about 68 bricks high, with the
flag
about 12 above that. But there are huge Lego towers that make it into
the
Guiness book of world records that dwarf even the largest things in the
Legolands.
/Eric/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
