Subject:
|
Re: Old Parts replaced by Newer Versions?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 29 Nov 1999 20:52:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
355 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Chris Dee wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Jamie Obrien writes:
> > Hi, i was just looking over some of my older space sets, and was
> > wondering whether the parts in LDraw should include the older versions
> > of parts that have been upgraded over the years?
>
> In general, yes, we try to include variants where these are either visibly
> different (like solid-stud vs. hollow stud minifig heads), or functionally
> different.
>
> It's all a matter of priority (and access to the parts themseleves). What is
> most important - new parts or variants of already modelled parts?
I'd say functionally-different variants are pretty important. Jamie's example
of the "Plate 1 x 1 with Clip Light" is one example of an important variation.
An example that has been discussed at length on L-CAD and lugnet.cad.dev at
length.
But it all comes down to the fact that whatever part-authors want to contribute
is what we get.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Old Parts replaced by Newer Versions?
|
| (...) In general, yes, we try to include variants where these are either visibly different (like solid-stud vs. hollow stud minifig heads), or functionally different. It's all a matter of priority (and access to the parts themseleves). What is most (...) (25 years ago, 28-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
