 | | POV dat - 3626bph5 - Minifig Head with Vincent Crabbe/Ron Weasley Pattern - POV [DAT]
|
|
0 Minifig Head with Vincent Crabbe/Ron Weasley Pattern - POV 0 Name: 3626bph5.dat 0 Author: Andy Westrate [westrate] 0 Unofficial Part 0 // using DAT code from LDRAW_ORG Part UPDATE 2010-02 0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see (...) (13 years ago, 9-Aug-11, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | POV dat - 3626b289 - Minifig Head with Thick Brown Eyebrows, Smirking Face - POV [DAT]
|
|
0 Minifig Head with Thick Brown Eyebrows, Smirking Face - POV 0 Name: 3626b289.dat 0 Author: J.C. Tchang [tchang] 0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part 0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt 0 // Inline POV code generated by (...) (13 years ago, 9-Aug-11, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Part Request (92906)
|
|
I modelling one of (URL) Crowkillers'> latest (URL) MOCs> and I find myself lacking a new part. I checked the Parts Tracker but I can't find any sign of it. I'm looking for the new (URL) Joint Axle> (part 92906). Seems simple enough, but I'm not (...) (13 years ago, 9-Aug-11, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | 4180d.dat (was: LDraw.org 2011-01 Parts Update Now Available) [DAT]
|
|
(...) Great work! Just one little problem, can't see that anybody else has signaled for: Part 4180d.dat 0 ~Moved to x996 0 Name: 4180d.dat - - - (snip) - - - 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 996.dat It says Moved to x996, but points to 996.dat without (...) (13 years ago, 8-Aug-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org 2011-01 Parts Update Now Available
|
|
(...) --snip-- Sorry about raising your hackles. This one was meant to be a jokey tone but rereading it I see it's not so much. Particularly since I tend to take a strong tone in my arguments in general. Tim (13 years ago, 7-Aug-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org 2011-01 Parts Update Now Available
|
|
(...) Yeah, sorry, I'm already registered at the new forum. My reaction was mainly against Tim's tone - as if 'modern' is the only working way. For some reason he raises my hackles quite often... I'm well used to web forums, but I still prefer NNTP (...) (13 years ago, 7-Aug-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org 2011-01 Parts Update Now Available
|
|
(...) Here's the deal: When I created the new forum and announced the change, I knew there would be some people who didn't like it. Change is hard, I acknowledge that. But we were driving away new blood for the sake of the old hats. Yes I like NNTP (...) (13 years ago, 7-Aug-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org 2011-01 Parts Update Now Available
|
|
(...) I do share your frustration, but if the new, slower and much more inefficient way to navigate through the forum threads really will attract new users, I will not stand in its way. I'll give it some time and hope for improvements that will (...) (13 years ago, 7-Aug-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org 2011-01 Parts Update Now Available
|
|
(...) Personally I have no problem with NNTP and would happily stick with it. Unfortunately most of the internet will not. So our choices (as I see them) are as follows: 1) Stick with LUGNET with NNTP but suffer a lack of new users who either can't (...) (13 years ago, 6-Aug-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org 2011-01 Parts Update Now Available
|
|
(...) NNTP is simply a more efficient protocol than HTTP for forums. I can't see the point in wasting time on web interfaces to forums, when NNTP is so much more efficient - and allows me to pick a user interface I like. Play well, Jacob (13 years ago, 6-Aug-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
