 | | Re: MLCad.ini and Unofficial parts
|
|
(...) It is quite normal that MLCad complaints. As explained here: (URL) package with the unofficial files is updated every 3 minutes and includes also held files. You'll therefore also get parts like this: (URL) is an extraordinary part but has (...) (15 years ago, 1-Jul-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: DATHeader Update (The Reviewer Tool) Version 2.0.6
|
|
(...) My main source for names is Peeron and I use BL only if there is no Peeron reference. Nonetheless I don't think that naming should be automated: * Peeron has no limit on characters * It has no scheme for pattern, component parts, shortcuts, (...) (15 years ago, 1-Jul-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: DATHeader Update (The Reviewer Tool) Version 2.0.6
|
|
(...) You are right, but also with Peeron the above mentioned problems still exists. So using Peeron will not be an option either. cu mikeheide (15 years ago, 30-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: MLCad.ini and Unofficial parts
|
|
(...) Please let us know how your [SCAN_ORDER] section in MLCad.ini looks like. I am sure we found your problem very fast. cu mikeheide (15 years ago, 30-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: MLCad.ini and Unofficial parts
|
|
(...) I don't know what you're doing wrong, but MLCAD does NOT expect the unofficial parts to in parts.lst. It scans those folders at startup for parts. --Travis (15 years ago, 30-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: DATHeader Update (The Reviewer Tool) Version 2.0.6
|
|
(...) I'm not going to try to convince you one way or another, but it seems to me that if you were to do something like this, Peeron would be a more logical choice as the source of the information, since Peeron and ldraw.org are much more closely (...) (15 years ago, 30-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | MLCad.ini and Unofficial parts
|
|
I'm not sure if I'm missing something... I have a LDraw\Unofficial folder with all the unofficial parts and MLCad.ini with the lines corresponding to the location of those unofficial parts uncommented. I open MLCad, scan for new parts and write a (...) (15 years ago, 30-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P -check Messages and hold votes
|
|
(...) I think the best would be to make an upgrade to L3P for current standards, as it is the most used checking tool IMHO. Most of the technical hold reasons are already defined but not present at the mentioned page. I have tried to put all I saw (...) (15 years ago, 30-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: DATHeader Update (The Reviewer Tool) Version 2.0.6
|
|
(...) Thank you very much for your feedback. If you follow the discussions made on the parts tracker then you would see that the description that bricklink uses is not in every case a choice that pass the parts tracker certifying process. If ever, I (...) (15 years ago, 29-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: DATHeader Update (The Reviewer Tool) Version 2.0.6
|
|
Mike, I have yet to author any parts, but I did download DATHeader and give it a try. It looks like a great program with a lot of great features! There is one thing that I would like to request that you add to DATHeader. I'd like to see DATHeader (...) (15 years ago, 29-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
