To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / *44600 (-10)
  Re: bendable track
 
(...) Yeah, about that... I guess Willy and I were both thinking at some point that maybe bands and hoses aren't really so different that they require two distinct paths through the lsynth code. So we did a quick and dirty experiment with the (...) (15 years ago, 17-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
 
  Re: Comments on some unofficial Train parts
 
(...) All battery boxes mentioned consists of several single parts like (URL) maybe (URL) all what you are looking for should be available at the PT. I hope that helps cu mikeheide (15 years ago, 16-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Comments on some unofficial Train parts
 
(...) Thanks, I also think this is complete (good work!). I just suggested to split the "x560etc." into two parts, like: (URL) a question of what can be considered a part. Battery boxes are usually made of two "parts" in real life. I'm not sure if (...) (15 years ago, 16-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  MiniBots
 
Hi, my son Sandro and I started to do instructions for our minibots. Since the last upload eight are already available after moderation. (URL) The picture is a link to the gallery (as soon as moderated). Only two of them are mine, guess which :-) (...) (15 years ago, 16-Apr-09, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, FTX) ! 
 
  Re: Comments on some unofficial Train parts
 
(...) SNIP I think you are talking about these battery boxes: your type 1 (URL) type 3 (note the opening for the contacts in the case) (URL) type 2 (URL) think this is complete. See also here: (URL) (15 years ago, 15-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Comments on some unofficial Train parts
 
Hello everyone, glad to see the traffic on Parts Tracker! As a railway fan I am double-glad to see some Train-specific parts developing. However, I have noticed some issues with part naming so I think it's better to solve them while the parts are (...) (15 years ago, 15-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: SR 3D Builder user manual
 
(...) The keyboard is usually much faster than the mouse, and I have all the commands memorized already (as do most people who use MLCAD, because it uses the same commands). -Mike (15 years ago, 15-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: bendable track
 
(...) Hi Willy, Thanks for the explanation. I've never touched the STRING_BAND synthesis, so we'll have to let Don speak to this. Kevin (15 years ago, 15-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
 
  Re: bendable track  [DAT]
 
(...) Upps! Looks like there is a gap in communication. Don started writing code which would allow using "bendable" and "band" constraints together. A first result can be seen in STRING_HOSE + STRING_BAND at: (URL) SYNTH BEGIN STRING_BAND 19 0 SYNTH (...) (15 years ago, 15-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
 
  Re: bendable track
 
(...) Hi Willy, "Spouse" bendables with treads? I'm not even married! LOL! I do not recognize the topic you are asking about. Kevin (15 years ago, 15-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR