|
|
 | | Re: New primitives?
|
| (...) Please let me have some example where they are useful. I found during authoring parts that, just for rounded parts, you would need lots of such truncated primitives, but they would need to be truncated anywhere and not only the way this new (...) (18 years ago, 26-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
| | | | | Re: New primitives?
|
| (...) Oh, and should the cap be at Y=0, or should the base be at Y=0? (For reference, with the stud primitive, the base is at Y=0.) --Travis (18 years ago, 26-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
| | | | | Re: New primitives?
|
| (...) OK, so I'll make this primitive, but which way should it face? Should it face up, like the stud primitive, or should it face down, like the box primitives? --Travis (18 years ago, 26-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
| | | | | Re: New primitives?
|
| (...) First of all, I like the idea of a unit capped cylinder. The stud could then be changed to a reference to the new primitive. We could use x-ycylc as the filenames and call the primitive Cylinder Capped. This would be consistent with the (...) (18 years ago, 26-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
| | | | | New primitives?
|
| In addition to the unit capped cylinder I suggested here (URL) I'd also like to see some truncated disc and ndis primitives, like the red ones shown below (the truncated disc can also be seen as a half chrd primitive). (URL) This would help building (...) (18 years ago, 26-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
|
