 | | Re: LDraw File Format Spec 1.0 DRAFT - Call for Public Comments
|
|
(...) Those matrices would be wrong in both cases (assuming xyz is the translation), you probably swapped those with the next matrices. :) (...) The first one here is a column major and the second is a row major matrix, and you are right, they are (...) (17 years ago, 22-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw File Format Spec 1.0 DRAFT - Call for Public Comments
|
|
(...) My issue with spaces is not with programs supporting them or not, it's that the elements inside a line are delimited by spaces, you have 1 <space> color <space> x <space> ... <part> but then when it comes to file names that rule is broken. I (...) (17 years ago, 22-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Bug in current version of LDList
|
|
(...) Thanks for the research! Unfortunately, I can't see the problem, the definition of the listbox in LDList doesn't match the description in the jrsoftware thread, Power Toys are delivered by Microsoft without any guarantees, ..., I think I'll (...) (17 years ago, 23-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Portable MPD Submodel Names
|
|
(...) Actually, I think you are correct. It makes sense from that perspective. The line type 1 naming rules apply to anything referenced by a type 1 line, including submodels. Thanks, Mike! Jim (17 years ago, 23-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Portable MPD Submodel Names
|
|
I think the answer is very easy. Linetype 1 is for referencing to an existing LDraw file, doesn't matter which type (part, subpart, primitive etc.) So it is not necessary to describe that in the MPD Language Extension. The MPD Language Extension is (...) (17 years ago, 22-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM Contest Questions and a Proposal
|
|
(...) OK. I will probably do this. (...) ;> to entirely custom alternate models as well? (By "alternate models" I mean (...) Right. Sounds good. (...) Ha, a good point! Sounds like LDView is used for the contest renders, so it probably wouldn't be a (...) (17 years ago, 23-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM Contest Questions and a Proposal
|
|
(...) OK. I think I will stick to the conservative naming scheme for now, just to be on the safe side. LDView's automatic part downloading is just killer. I suppose a reason to use submodels is to guard against the chance the unofficial parts are (...) (17 years ago, 23-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM Contest Questions and a Proposal
|
|
(...) How is this different from photographers sharing high-resolution images of their work on Flickr, or developers contributing to open-source programs? I would argue that with the original material available for others to compare, it is even (...) (17 years ago, 23-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw File Format Spec 1.0 DRAFT - Call for Public Comments
|
|
(...) Ok, the whitespace debate has gone on long enough. It's been years now! Someone in the LSC needs to step up and really define what's an acceptable filename, whitespace and all. Personally I think since MLCad is established, popular, and pretty (...) (17 years ago, 23-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw File Format Spec 1.0 DRAFT - Call for Public Comments
|
|
(...) So we may considered this fully, please give your reasons for this request. The file names always fall at the end of the line, so, "because it's easier to parse" has already been considered by the LSC and discarded many thanks William Howard (17 years ago, 22-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
