 | | Re: BFC inversion...
|
|
(...) No it isn't. (...) You are correct. CERTIFY, according to the BFC spec, is only allowed once in the file, before the first 'executable' line, on the very first BFC meta-statement. In fact, CERTIFY is *required* on that line. Steve (20 years ago, 6-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC inversion... [DAT]
|
|
Please let me know if this works OK now...... Thanks......... 0 Minifig Torso - SW Blast Armor (Green Plates) 0 Name: 973psb.dat 0 Author: Franklin W. Cain 0 LDRAW_ORG Part UPDATE 2002-04 0 CMDLINE -c7 0 KEYWORDS Star Wars, Boba Fett, bounty hunter, (...) (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC inversion...
|
|
(...) If so, then I missed it too (which is entirely possible!) I've never used CERTIFY at the beginning of a file, and TMK it's never been a problem. I use "BFC INVERTNEXT" where necessary, but no blanket CERTIFY statement. Is the inclusion of the (...) (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC inversion...
|
|
(...) Also, is it now standard to repeat the 'CERTIFY' keyword on every BFC line? I thought CERTIFY was only useful once at the beginning of the file? I've been out of the loop, did I miss something? -Kyle (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC inversion...
|
|
(...) Since you used a mirrored reference to the subfiles, you should not need the INVERTNEXT statements. (...) With 2D objects, you should flip & rotate them to show their front face, not use INVERTNEXT. Steve (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | BFC inversion...
|
|
this is the first time I've tried using the "invertnext" BFC statement. would someone plz double check my code? thnx....... (...) (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 973pSB.dat -- Now optimized and BFC'ed [DAT]
|
|
uses these two subfiles: (URL) Minifig Torso - SW Blast Armor (Green Plates) 0 Name: 973psb.dat 0 Author: Franklin W. Cain, based on Matt Schild's original 0 LDRAW_ORG Part UPDATE 2002-04 0 CMDLINE -c7 0 KEYWORDS Star Wars, Boba Fett, bounty hunter, (...) (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 973pSB2.dat -- Now optimized and BFC'ed [DAT]
|
|
2nd of 2 subfiles; "main" file will also be posted shortly... 0 ~Minifig Torso - SW Blast Armor (Plates; 1/2) 0 Name: s\973psb2.dat 0 Author: Franklin W. Cain (fwcain@yahoo.com) 0 LDRAW_ORG Subpart UPDATE 2002-04 0 COMMENT Gaps in chest plates for (...) (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 973pSB1.dat -- Now optimized and BFC'ed [DAT]
|
|
1st of 2 subfiles; "main" file will also be posted shortly... 0 ~Minifig Torso - SW Blast Armor (Detail; 1/2) 0 Name: s\973psb1.dat 0 Author: Franklin W. Cain 0 LDRAW_ORG Subpart UPDATE 2002-04 0 BFC CERTIFY CW 0 // 2004-10-04 FWC BFC-ed 4 16 -12 0 (...) (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: I want to become a reviewer
|
|
Excellent post, Niels! :) (...) To expand on this- it's very good to keep edges grouped with polygons, but it's also nice (at least at the beginning of the file), to put the edges first. Laying out the frame of the part makes it easier to see what (...) (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Working on 6032.dat Brick 2 x 3 x 1 & 2/3 Octagonal offset
|
|
(...) How far have you gotten with that? I was working on that one awhile ago, but I never finished it. If you're interested, I can send you what I have. (...) Umm, I've got a 30086c01 (Inflatable Boat) that's finished, but can't be separated into (...) (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: I want to become a reviewer
|
|
(snip) Wow, that's some great advice. Lots of good things for new reviewers to take heed and consider. I'd love to see that info extracted and made referencable, perhaps somewhere in this area: (URL) specifically either here (URL) or here (URL) (...) (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Working on 6032.dat Brick 2 x 3 x 1 & 2/3 Octagonal offset
|
|
(...) the 4876 Fabuland Slide part. (...) I'm working on 6032.dat Brick 2 x 3 x 1 & 2/3 Octagonal offset, which is really nasty and wont be finished soon. After that I plan on using the primitives for that one to improve (and BFC) on the other (...) (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I want to become a reviewer
|
|
Hi Niels I think it’s really, really great that you whish to join the core. (hey guys, give him a hero’s welcome!) I myself haven’t been a reviewer for very long (or haven’t authored many parts yet for that sake) and isn’t particularly experienced, (...) (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Interesting affect of alpha channels in POV-Ray
|
|
I've been playing with PNG transparency in POV-Ray and discovered an interesting effect. POV-Ray considers a ray that hits the backdrop as transparent, yet the color of the invisible backdrop still affects the rendering of the model. When (...) (20 years ago, 5-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | LDraw.org Downtime
|
|
Per the following post: (URL) will be down 10/5 at 2pm EDT for about 15 min. Since Peeron also hosts LDraw.org, LDraw.org will be down as well. -Orion (20 years ago, 4-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub mask generation
|
|
(...) Mike, I recovered your emails about this problem and chasing it down. (...) Kevin (20 years ago, 4-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub and Lsynth page for tracking enhancement requests and bug fixes
|
|
(...) Looking at the above list seriously..... You list a number of sub-model specific desires including: 1. view angle on a sub-model basis. You already have this using MLCad's ROTSTEP meta-command. ROTSTEP only applies to the file that contains (...) (20 years ago, 4-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub request
|
|
(...) The PLIST BEGIN SUB meta solution is fine. My problem was due to a lack of knowledge regarding LPub META commands. -Orion (20 years ago, 4-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub and Lsynth page for tracking enhancement requests and bug fixes
|
|
(...) My solution to the above is to give you explicit control over construction image render window size and PLI render window size. You can set these sizes small for test runs. Is this acceptable? It will be available in the next LPub release. (...) (20 years ago, 4-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
