 | | Re: Rendering problems
|
|
(...) David, that I am aware of there is no way you can just render the wireframes of your model using POV-Ray. Has anyone attempted this? (...) Read and follow this article for more info on radiosity. (URL) In a nutsheel radiosity is a function in (...) (20 years ago, 17-May-04, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mac Brick CAD and the Imerial Star Destroyer
|
|
(...) Thanks for the MBC update! PowerBook G4, 400MHz, 512MB RAM, IBM TravelStar 40GN 40GB HD (4200 RPM), OS X 10.3.3 (build 7F44), 8MB Rage128. I don't have the .mpd extension mapped to MBC, so I dropped the Star Destroyer MPD on the MBC app. Timed (...) (20 years ago, 17-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Rendering problems
|
|
I got 2 problems 1.how can I just render the wireframes? 2.what is radiosity and how to use it? -David Chiu (20 years ago, 17-May-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Mac Brick CAD and the Imerial Star Destroyer
|
|
Following the comments by James with Orion Pobursky's version of 10030 (Imperial Star Destroyer), I took a look at the file. In it's original form there was 3 problems: 1. MBC is case sensitive when referencing sub-models (don't know if this is good (...) (20 years ago, 17-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW ANIMATION
|
|
Thank you so much. Jason (20 years ago, 17-May-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Onion Dome (part 44511) from Orient Expedition sets
|
|
(...) I said idealised, not standard. (...) I am sure they did. But they didn't make things that had figure eight cross sections much of the way up, if I am not much mistaken. (...) It is more than that, it is a quarter of a *cylinder*, a geometric (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Help with Lsynth [DAT]
|
|
(...) Hi Jeroen, LSynth does not recognize L520.DAT and L521.DAT as constraints. I was able to synthesize a hose like this: 0 Untitled 0 Name: lsynth2.ldr 0 Author: jeroen de haan ( info@digitalbricks.nl ) 0 Unofficial Model 0 SYNTH BEGIN (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | RE: Onion Dome (part 44511) from Orient Expedition sets
|
|
(...) parts (...) actual (...) According to my dictionary a dome is any curved or vaulted roof. It does not have to be circular, or even regular. The fact that something doesn't exist in reality is hardly a reason to reject a name for what is a toy. (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Onion Dome (part 44511) from Orient Expedition sets
|
|
(...) I would argue that two parts back to back make something that is not an actual dome, but rather some shape never seen in reality. (...) I would disagree, it is in fact highly relevant. If I take an idealised onion dome and divide it in half, I (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | RE: Onion Dome (part 44511) from Orient Expedition sets
|
|
I would have to disgree. The part is half a dome - it takes two parts to make a complete dome, therefore one part is only half of the dome. The fact that the resulting shape is not half of a circle is largely irrelevant IMHO. Even if you remove the (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Onion Dome (part 44511) from Orient Expedition sets
|
|
(...) I am not so keen on "half" because it's not really exactly a half of a dome, it's rather more than half. (put two back to back to see what I mean). I'd support calling it "partial" or something like that. Or even "facade" since I think the (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | RE: Onion Dome (part 44511) from Orient Expedition sets
|
|
-----Original Message----- (...) Sounds good to me. Next question. What's the correct category? Roof? (Which makes sense but isn't on the 'approved' list in the FAQ) Panel? (Which kinda makes sense if the name is 'Panel 8 x 12 x 10 Half Onion Dome' (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Onion Dome (part 44511) from Orient Expedition sets
|
|
(...) I think the only vaguely similar part is 6121 'Roof Piece 4 x 8 x 6 Half Pyramid' (URL) happy with the inserion of "half" in the existing peeron name 'Roof Piece 8 x 12 x 10 Half Onion Dome'. .........^^^^......... Chris (20 years ago, 16-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Onion Dome (part 44511) from Orient Expedition sets
|
|
What dimension should I use in the name? The maximum "bulge" in the dome (ie 8 x 12 x 10) or the base size (ie 6 x 8 x 10) (20 years ago, 16-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Help with Lsynth [DAT]
|
|
Hi all, I am trying to make a simple U shaped pneumatic hose thing with this file as a start: 0 Untitled 0 Name: ding.ldr 0 Author: jeroen de haan ( info@digitalbricks.nl ) 0 Unofficial Model 0 ROTATION CENTER 0 0 0 1 "Custom" 0 ROTATION CONFIG 0 0 (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Useful Shortcut: a04q.dat - Cylinder Angle Tube 90 degrees
|
|
(...) Yes, you are very right! Thanks! (20 years ago, 16-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Useful Shortcut: a04q.dat - Cylinder Angle Tube 90 degrees [DAT]
|
|
(...) That's cool, but I would include the edge line at the join, ie: 0 Cylinder Angle Tube 90 degrees 0 Name: a04q.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 1 16 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 4-4cyls.dat 1 16 -1 1 0 0 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 1 4-4cyls.dat 1 16 0 1 0 -1 1 0 -1 (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Useful Shortcut: a04q.dat - Cylinder Angle Tube 90 degrees [DAT]
|
|
"How on earth do I rotate those cyls's...?", I've asked myself many times. Here's a useful shortcut that continues a thought cylinder in the y direction and turns 90 degrees to the left. To be inlined or even official primitive if you all like it as (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Motion Blur (Was: NEW ANIMATION)
|
|
(...) Interesting will try a test or two. Steve (20 years ago, 15-May-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.animation, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW ANIMATION
|
|
Hello Steve (...) However (...) porblem I (...) How about increasing or decreasing the rotation speed of the wheels, or would that conflict too much with the distance traveled by the wheels? Is increasing or decreasing the framerate an option? (...) (20 years ago, 15-May-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.animation, lugnet.technic)
|
