 | | Re: Call for Nominations to LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Yes. Unfortunately, the acronym can cause confusion. We should fix that by clearly defining acronyms for each. There is the LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) - elected last July and charged with adopting standards and publishing spec (...) (20 years ago, 27-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations to LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Um, I feel a bit foolish, but since Andrew brought it up I guess I should ask. Are there really two different LSCs, a Steering Committee and a Standards Committee? If so, what's the difference? I must've missed that somewhere. Thanks, Don (20 years ago, 27-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial LeoCAD parts update #17
|
|
Ha, my post certainly stirred up some folks out there! I just want to let you know that allthough I'm not a mac user I simply prefer Leocad above (for example) MLCad because I think it's simply more intuitive and works a lot faster. I know that (...) (20 years ago, 27-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.leocad)
|
| |
| | Steering Committee Recommendations (was: Re: Call for Nominations to LDraw.org ...)
|
|
Hi Dan - Thanks for posting your thoughts. Please see mine interspersed. (...) I (...) these (...) a (...) to (...) organization, (...) Good summation. I agree, it is important people realize the trust they are putting into these elected (...) (20 years ago, 27-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial LeoCAD parts update #17
|
|
(...) That would be a good thing for the life of this nice editor! Philo (20 years ago, 27-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.leocad)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial LeoCAD parts update #17
|
|
(...) No. It started out as a viewer, but I added an LEDIT compatible editor mode a long time ago. (...) You can do it that way by putting ldglite in polling mode. In fact that's what I initially thought would work best for me. But the poll and (...) (20 years ago, 27-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.leocad)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial LeoCAD parts update #17
|
|
(...) But isn't Ldglite just a viewer, compared to the editor Leocad? That said, it seems to have the advantage of actually working, so maybe Emacs + Ldglite would be a viable way to edit Ldraw files. Last time I tried Leocad it crashed after a (...) (20 years ago, 27-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.leocad)
|
| |
| | Advise on Flex tubing and Pneumatic hoses
|
|
I have been making the custom length flex tubing (using 75.dat and 76.dat) for a while, I normally crate the length I want save it for future use as, for exampl 75_12.dat and import it into my model as a subpart to allow for use of the .mpd on other (...) (20 years ago, 27-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations to LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) didn't (...) I don't disagree with the names you suggested, what I don't really understand is why it would be a Good Thing for a candidate not to inform about his/her intentions (or lack thereof)? -- Anders Isaksson, Sweden BlockCAD: (2 URLs) (20 years ago, 26-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial LeoCAD parts update #17
|
|
(...) Oops, sorry Don ;o) (I am not a Linux user...) Philo (20 years ago, 26-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.leocad)
|
