 | | Re: LPub 2.0 not seeing POV-Ray 3.5?
|
|
(...) Did you download LPub from here: (URL) so, there's an error with this distribution. I can send you the correct file if you'd like. -Orion (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) Ugh! That's probably because I went the 'Ownerdraw' route to get the colors. I'll take a look at it when real life permits (couple of weeks...). -- Anders Isaksson, Sweden BlockCAD: (2 URLs) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw based editor... GLIDE.
|
|
(...) hi Daniel, I have tested GLIDE 0.7 and i must say it looks promising. As simple as it is now, the interface seems very effective. In a more stable and polished state, undoubtly it would be my preferred editor for small models. It's difficult (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | LPub 2.0 not seeing POV-Ray 3.5?
|
|
Hi all, Having some problems with LPub 2.0 - namely, when I attempt to start it up, I get an error message saying that it can't find the registry entries for POV-Ray, even though I have POV-Ray 3.5 installed on my Windows 98SE system. I have a (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) You should take a peek at it. I use it to open an ldlist part finder window so I can drag and drop parts into ldglite. Hey that reminds me, the new colored fonts in ldlist 4 look bad on my system. Here's a picture: (URL) font used in the (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) I'm fairly certain that my DATBase and L3Check units (individual linetype manipulating classes and Error checking from L3P code) are compatible with a variety of Pascal compliers. DATModel (classes for model level maniplation) may pose a (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
"Orion Pobursky" <orion@dontaddthis.p...ursky.com> skrev i meddelandet news:Hw88DL.1D7H@lugnet.com... (...) units used (...) own (...) I'm using Delphi 5 (Both at work and for fun). Haven't really looked much at LDDP yet but the plugin architecture (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) I have the beginnings of this with the DATBase, DATModel, and L3Check units used for LDDP. I've been considering splintering these units off into their own project. The only thing hindering me is the (apparent) lack of Delphi programmers in (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) Yes, I think we can go in that direction. It would certainly make updating errors a lot simpler. And since most of LDDP's functions manipulate the text in some way it's easily doable. (...) No, but there is hope. See above -Orion (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) Then you should suggest that on the web page, or in the book. People forget what they discussed on lugnet after a week or so. [snip: many, many lsynth features. It's time for me to buy the book] (...) That sounds good, but will lsynthcp still (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw based editor... GLIDE.
|
|
(...) I think ldview and ldglite can do this. (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) Cool! I actually like the plugin idea even better than open source (although the two ideas do work together well). In my LDRAW fantasy world (which is probably based on Karim's Artemis paper) all the really nifty functionality is provided by (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw based editor... GLIDE.
|
|
(...) Now that would be the zoom, wouldn't it? What I actually meant was a) a zoom that can get "inside" a model (useful for buildings specially) and b) a way to move and rotate the camera's target point. (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) That is my experience. Nobody has said anything about the source code I have posted. And not all of it was my yucky code, but some awesome OpenGL code written by an OpenGL wiz. And I have tried to read both ldglite, MBC, and LDView source (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) Don't forget LDDP's generator (soon to be a plugin again). It's based on Fredrik Glockner's emacs code and supports: 73590B.DAT Hose Flexible 8.5L with Tabs (750.dat for endpoints) 73590A.DAT Hose Flexible 8.5L without Tabs (752.dat for (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw based editor... GLIDE.
|
|
(...) My pleasure (...) 3DS stands for 3D Studio, or 3DS Max, as it now is called. This was originally an Autodesk product, now offered by Discreet. (URL) what I was referring to is the file format, which has become one of the standard ways to share (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Don Heyse wrote: <snip> (...) I expect people to ask me. (...) LSynth is an all in one synthesizer in that it does hose and band type synthesis, and it is stand alone, and the synthesis process does not involve manual copying of stuff (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) Yes, with a wider audience or a desperate need, it's much more likely someone will be brave enough to jump in and contribute. It also helps if the project seems active. I tried to generate some activity by making a portable version of the (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker part Discussion: 3626bp01.dat, Head with std grin
|
|
(...) How about not. s\3626bs00.dat exists for a specific purpose, and I don't think this is a good reason to hijack the file. Steve (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker part Discussion: 3626bp01.dat, Head with std grin
|
|
(...) I would definitely like to do this, because the resulting heads look much better, IMO. (see (URL) Through the magic of perl, I've already modified many of the heads on my computer. (...) Hopefully it's the ball joint that's sized wrong, (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
