 | | Re: Animation using Datsville
|
|
(...) On second thought, this would be a bad idea, because objects outside the view cone could affect things, like reflections, shadows, and fog (important!!!). (21 years ago, 6-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Animation using Datsville
|
|
(...) True, but that would be an example of sloppy modeling on the part of the author ;) . (21 years ago, 6-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Animation using Datsville
|
|
(...) It's not exactly surprising that it worked ok, but if he didn't include any MPD support, then the results aren't necessarily correct. Since he presumably only pays attention to the locations of parts that he's willing to box, the references to (...) (21 years ago, 6-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Animation using Datsville
|
|
(...) It worked fine for me. But then, I had to split it up into sections, just like Orion did. (21 years ago, 6-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: New experimental LeoCAD parts update available
|
|
(...) Are the parts compatible? Can they be batch-converted? (21 years ago, 6-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.leocad)
|
