To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / *33340 (-20)
  Re: NATHANAELS 4099 TRANSFORMER
 
(...) Thanks both Steve for his great animation and you too Jaco! So you haven't seen this moc before Jaco? It was also there at LEGOworld. Maybe you'll see it nexttime. Den Helder perhaps? Nathanael (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: Vintage lightbrick 2 x 4
 
I never thought this vintage part would be reviewed so quickly :-) Two more comments: (...) Whoops, my fault (shamed I did not notice that....) (...) I don't know about this statement, can somebody explain this for me? As I noticed on the pictures (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
 
(...) The relatively easy solution on how to make the wrench tool and, even more obvious, the (unofficial) patterned maxifig heads - that solution has become undone. (...) The only thing that ever has frustrated me about LGEO is that I never ever (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: A&M LWorks Presents a Jamie Neufeld Creation: Slave-1 POD
 
Here is a preview of what the next Star Wars POD will be: after moderation: (URL) direct link (URL) (hint: TIE Fighter) (hint 2: TIE Avenger (not in image) also will be released soon) -AHui A&M LWorks (2 URLs) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.inst, FTX)
 
  Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
 
(...) What's entailed? Do you want participants who can test but not do much else? (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
 
(...) Actually, the only Official Library parts that have embedded P-R SDL are some of Paul Easter torus primitives. Since nothing was ever done in the first place, nothing is being undone now. If you're like me and frustrated that LGEO is (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
 
(...) Only until 3rd party libraries (like LGEO) become available. ROSCO (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
 
(...) Too sad. If I got that complicated language correcly, this means that the problem presented at (URL) and was solved by embedded POV-code has now regressed to be un-solved again. /Tore (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  A&M LWorks Presents a Jamie Neufeld Creation: Slave-1 POD
 
(2 URLs) More images can be found here (after moderation): (URL) You can download the BIs from here: (URL) -AHui A&M LWorks (URL) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.inst, FTX)
 
  Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
 
(...) Yes, and if you want to join the project team let me know (this goes for anyone else as well). (...) -Orion (21 years ago, 19-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
 
(...) OK, but whether or not the P-R SDL code was out of whack would not affect the usability of parts as parts within LDraw format programs themselves, right? (0)Only affect the accuracy or completeness or error state of transformation (by tools (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
 
(...) Yay! The right place for POV code is in external libraries. Does this mean (URL) is going to be developed? Is a new L3P release in the works? It's been over a year and a half since this tantalizing message was posted. :^) (URL) Don (21 years ago, 19-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
 
(...) Basically, The POV team controls the syntax, functionality, and implementation of the POV-Ray Scene Description Language (P-R SDL) format. While the POV Team is very good at maintaining backwards compatibility, they have in the past change the (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
 
(...) Could you give a bit more info on the compatability issues (or a pointer to where they're discussed)? (21 years ago, 19-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
 
The LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) has recently discussed the issue of embedded POV-Ray code in Official Parts Library files. After careful consideration and with inputs from leading non-LSC members, most notably Lars Hassing and Chris Dee, we (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: New colors are defined as what in LDraw????
 
---snip--- (...) Willy could you post your modified file someone so I can take a look at it? Thanks, -AHui LDraw Help Desk (URL) (21 years ago, 19-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
 
  Re: Adding part updates
 
(...) Hi Don, Yeah, looking at it again, I have to say that I agree; six and seven should be switched. I also need to mention that the user should download all the updates. My best guess, since the date on the ldraw parts for linux file is not (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
 
  Re: Dinosaur parts
 
(...) The dinosaur leg pieces also appear to be made up of a few parts. The one I'm looking at has the left and right legs (in green), a central plastic piece (in grey), and a metal rod joining the pieces. So 40384 could be the middle plastic piece. (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: New colors are defined as what in LDraw????
 
(...) Nope. But partnames don't show up in rendered files. Colors do. (21 years ago, 19-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: New colors are defined as what in LDraw????
 
(...) I agree, it is a valid opinion. my question is: why nobody stood up asking to rename all the duplo parts at the PT into "explore"? do we really have to copy slavishly all the marketing stunts? w. (21 years ago, 19-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR