 | | Re: New Part: x716.dat - 0 Brick 2 x 4 x 1 Ring
|
|
(...) I think so. I don't actually have these parts, but I was just looking at some last Saturday. Here's a comparison pic (URL) TWS Garrison (URL) capital letters in address for direct reply. (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New (well...) Part: x717.dat - Brick 2 x 14 with Groove
|
|
(...) Wow, you weren't kidding about old. I assume the studs don't have logos on the real one, since you went so far as to avoid using the stud primitive. I've never seen the part, so the only comment I have isn't related to the geometry. Any (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x716.dat - 0 Brick 2 x 4 x 1 Ring
|
|
(...) Thanks! Well, it took some hours to make. (...) Oh. I didn't know there was a variant without cutouts. Do they look exactly the same apart from the cutouts? /Tore (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New (well...) Part: x717.dat - Brick 2 x 14 with Groove [DAT]
|
|
Now we're talking *old* LEGO! 8-) 0 Brick 2 x 14 with Groove 0 Name: x717.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unufficial Part 0 BFC CERTIFY CCW 0 KEYWORDS vintage 4 16 140 24 20 136 24 16 -136 24 16 -140 24 20 4 16 -140 24 20 -136 24 16 -136 24 -16 -140 (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x716.dat - 0 Brick 2 x 4 x 1 Ring
|
|
(...) Looks nice. (...) 'Brick 2 x 4 Half Round with Cutouts' would fit in with 3063, 2577, and 30357. Alternatively, "Round Brick 4 x 4 Half with Cutouts" or "Round Brick 2 x 4 Half with Cutouts" (depending on how you look at it) could get the (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part: x716.dat - 0 Brick 2 x 4 x 1 Ring [DAT]
|
|
At last, I lay my greedy hands on one of this rare, vintage macarony variant! I just had to LDraw it at once... A better name, anyone? 0 Brick 2 x 4 x 1 Ring 0 Name: x716.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unofficial Part 0 KEYWORDS macaroni, round, (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(URL) anyone have *any* feedback on these ideas? Orion? Please let me know (even in a private e-mail if you want) if you think these are viable alternatives or if they're totally not worth considering! I'd appreciate any comment! Thanks, --Ryan (URL) (21 years ago, 8-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(...) I think this is a moot point, but... The rule could be written so that a contributor must allow/license their work for publication on the contest website, for people to view/examine in relation to the contest, but not for further (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Need partnumbers and some partnames
|
|
(...) I think putting Motor Cutout in the keywords would work, if we can't reasonably fit it in the part title. (...) OK, I think Stop and Proceed are OK for the names. (...) So the light bulb can be physically removed from the complete part? But (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LGEO Problem in POV-Ray
|
|
(...) The error occurs with this code from the your file: #if (QUAL > 0) #declare _4319_dot_dat_slope = object { // Hinge Bar 8 with Split Rod Holder lg_4319_slope matrix <0,0,-20/LG_BRICK_WIDTH, -20/LG_BRICK_WIDTH,0,0, 0,-24/LG_BRICK_HEIGHT,0, (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
