 | | Re: Bugs with the Parts Tracker
|
|
(...) First off, a bigger issue with this file is that it is a model, not a part. I feel it goes beyond the idea of a shortcut, or complete assembly. However, to your point. This file uses *3* unofficial files. Yes, they are updates of (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Black colour in new instructions
|
|
(...) Right. Do we want to work that out in lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, or are people OK with the LSC taking the discussion off-lugnet? Steve (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.inst, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Legacy Files on the Parts Tracker
|
|
(...) OK, so let's figure out a better sort order. The possible 'statuses' for files are: - Certified! - Needs Admin review - Needs more votes - Subfiles aren't certified - Hold My thinking when I constructed the list and the sorting was: - Keep the (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 2706.dat - Technic Action Figure Shoe
|
|
Hey, great to see you (two) are still working on the figure's parts; My Go cart is patiently waiting for a driver :) It looks about right... not much time to play with the part yet though. -Andrew (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Legacy Files on the Parts Tracker
|
|
(...) Make deals with people. Trade reviews - you'll look at their files (and offer honest reviews) if they'll look at yours. (...) I'm sorry you've gotten that feeling. My feeling is that the current system gives a lot *more* power to the standard (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Legacy Files on the Parts Tracker
|
|
Going back a ways for this one... (...) I considered going a similar route when I constructed the PT: offer reviewers a list of checkpoints that they should consider when posting a review. I abandoned this thinking because the 'rules' for processing (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Black colour in new instructions
|
|
(...) This should be non-issue once we finally sit down and hash out exactly how to format and support the ldconfig.dat file. -Orion (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.inst, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Black colour in new instructions
|
|
(...) Yup, I'm aware of the MLCAD custom colours, but there is a good reason for me not wanting to use these unilaterally: with tools such as LPub generating parts list images and inventories, I thought it might make sense to have a commonly (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-03, to lugnet.inst, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New Primitive: Stud11.dat - Stud Scala Hollow
|
|
(...) As long as you're planning to develop it to reasonable completion, I'd be comfortable if you submitted it to the PT with a comment that you are still finishing it. Steve (21 years ago, 2-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Black colour in new instructions
|
|
(...) I can't really see allocating 'AxleBlack' as a standard LDraw.org color, since the two shades are an artifact of Lego instructions. But you can easily do this on your own - use the Custom button in MLCAD's color dialog to specify a different (...) (21 years ago, 2-Nov-03, to lugnet.inst, lugnet.cad)
|
