|
|
 | | Re: Torus Primitives on the Part Tracker
|
| (...) Cool! (...) More cool! (...) the two related part files, neither of which is certified, I'd say go ahead and update t04q3333.dat. (...) Certainly. Steve (21 years ago, 6-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
| | | | | Re: WOULD YOU PLEASE...
|
| [crossposted to lugnet.cad.dev, with followup-to set there as well -- this thread isn't about posting LDR files to lugnet] (...) If anyone is not sure about the general rule/protocol/guidelines on this: for new parts (not fixes), you should *always* (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: New Primitive Class
|
| (...) If we can only create outside sections,[1] why not keep the leading t, but change the i/o/q? Maybe x, for extended? As for the ratio decimals in the file name, instead of noting the tube:major ratio (which is >1), use the inverse major:tube (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: Some secrets of MLCad revealed ...
|
| (...) <snip> Cool! Should perform a lot faster on searching I would expect 400 points? That seems low to me. Most of my models have more than that many elements! Even with shared vertices that seems low. (21 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
| | | | | Re: 1st LSC: Call for Nominations
|
| (...) Thanks, but no thanks, I don't think I can find the time necessary. I find it important to have programmers involved, since they have to parse whatever is being proposed, so I'm glad Michael Lachmann has accepted nomination. I'd like also to (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
